Yuval Noah Harari: “How do you share the planet with this new superintelegency? ‘

Liberters often take these mechanisms for grant and refuse to consider where they come. For example, you have the electricity and drinking water in your house. When you go to the bathroom and flow the water, the ditch goes into a huge shooting system. That the system is created and maintained by the state. But in the libertant mentine, it’s easy to take it for supposed to be just just the toilet and run the water and no one has to keep it. But of course, someone needs.

There really is a thing like a perfect free market. In addition to competition, there is always need to be a sort of trust trust. Ceri some things can be created for a free market, perute, there is some service and needs that they cannot be supported by market competition. Justice is an example.

Imagine a perfect free market. Suppose you enter a business contract with you, and breaks that contract. So we go to the court and ask the judge to take a decision. But what if I had burned the judge? Suddenly you can’t trust free market. I wouldn’t tolerate the judge taking the side of the person who paid the most bribles. If justice should be traded in a completely free market, itself-justice would be collapses and people would no longer trust each other. The trust to honor contracts and promises disappear, and it does not sit without location.

So, any competition always requires some trust structure. In my book, I used the example of the world’s football cup. You have the teams of different countries in competitors, but for competition to take the agreement, you need to be agreement in a common set of rules. If Japan had their rules and Germany had another set of rules, there would be no competition. In other words, even competition requires a funding of trust and common agreement. Otherwise, sending you collapse.

Photography: Yoshimatsu shinaro

In the NexusNote that mass mass has been made possible, which information technology do you mod develop request in democratic institutions are in love. If you tros, in addition to the negative opportunities of the people and the totalisism, what positive changed in democracies are possible?

Inside the socials, for example, fake stations, disinformation, and theater by lying spread to destroyed with people. But algorithms are not necessarily the spreaders of a fake news and conspiracy theories. Many they’ve obtained this just because they were thought to do.

The purpose of Facebook algorithm, YouTube, and Tiktok is to maximize user’s commitment. It’s the easiest way of doing this, it’s discovered after so much try and error, it was to differ information that fed up of people, and desires. This is because when people are angry, I am more likely to pursue the information and stressing others, who have the embarrassment increased.

But which one are we given the algorithm a different purpose? For example, if you give them a goal as their own trust between people or increasing truth, algorithm does not spill the fake news. To the contrary, will help build a better society, a better Democratic society.