Why the destruction of Iran’s nuclear program is so difficult

The Stratotanker KC-135 plane hunts B-2 aircraft with the 509th Bomb over Kansas on August 29, 2012.

Photo by US Air Force

Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Iran looks at the opportunity to see its most important nuclear facilities affected by an American 30,000 pounds.

White House representatives on Tuesday reported NBC News that the US president Donald Trump views a number of options including directly bright IranAfter the American leader repeatedly claimed that his administration would not allow Iran to continue his nuclear program or achieve the possibilities of creating bombs.

Trump called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender” in a report of social truth that the United States had the opportunity to attempt on Iran’s High leader Ayatala Ali Khamenei.

“It is an easy goal, but there is safe – we are not going to bring it out (kill!) At least not yet,” Trump wrote shortly after the “full control” of Iranian airspace.

On June 13, the conflict caused by the unexpected attacks of Israel on Iranian military and nuclear facilities, sent oil prices and put the region to the edge. Initially encouraging diplomatic negotiations with Tehran, Trump’s statements are becoming more threatening as a population in the Middle East for what’s next.

But the destruction of Iran’s nuclear program – which, according to Tehran, is designed only for a civic energy goal – this is not a simple feat.

The most advanced and hardened nuclear establishment of Iran, the Ford Fodard in the northwest of the country is a fortress.

Built inside the mountain about 300 feet underground and enhanced by layers of concrete, the plant-which is the most likely goal of a potential American strike-passing bomb, except for massive penetration GBU-57 (MOP). The US is the only country in the world that has such a “bunker bunker” weapon as well as the only country with a plane capable of transporting and expanding: B2 Spirit Stealth Bomber.

Iran’s permanent attacks with ballistic missiles to Israel are seen from Tel -Vaviv, Israel on June 17, 2025.

Mostafa alkharouf | Images Anadolu Getty

In part, Israel was so eager to participate in our offensive operations against Iran, except for its defensive ones.

But the strike itself would not be a one -time job, military experts say.

“So you have two problems. You will have to give up two of these penetrating on the same site” and probably will need several rounds of bombing, according to David de Roshs, Professor and Senior Military Officer

“And then you will never be sure of how much object you damaged,” he added, referring to the staff can be deployed on the ground.

“It makes me believe that for these facilities Israel will eventually get control over the air, and then land on the ground, make them go into the object, throwing off the door, and then go and put the explosive charges, allocate as they can get, and just blow it from the inside,” said de Rosh.

A wider war for America?

Over the past few days, Iran’s military capabilities have been strongly degraded by Israeli attacks, which have taken considerable parts of aviation protection, ballistic batteries, teams and control and dozens of best commanders.

However, such a strike by the United States can cause Iran to respond by striking US assets in the region like embassies and military bases. Trump made it clear that any attack on a US employee would lead to a tough American response, which would then deeply draw the most powerful military in the world into a regional conflict.

“Iranians reported that they were ready to attack US bases in the region in the event of an attack on their internal soil,” said Gregory Ber, a senior analyst in Iran and energy consultations at the risk of Eurosia Group, noting that US bases in Iraq are particularly vulnerable.

Why Iran does not seem - expert

“In this environment, there are risks that Iranian revenge leads to the victims of the United States, kills us by the military and potentially forces President Trump to expand US action and order additional strokes on Iran, and of course, threatens the overall escalation and involve us not only in one operation.”

Despite its enormous scale, the GPU-57 bunker would not have created widespread damage outside the object area, De Rochs said. But this would have a “deep psychological impact on Iranians,” he added, who has already noticed significant damage and radioactive risk of contamination in the infrastructure of several nuclear sites in other parts of the country.

Another critical question remains whether the Trump administration will restrict itself to target nuclear sites, whether it will expand operations outside this – something calls for the Israeli government, because it is a desire to see the regime of change for its perennial enemy.

No such thing as

“I think the conflict will end when Israel is sure that Iran has lost, over a considerable period of time, the ability to make nuclear weapons, and that its protection is weakened enough, that Israel will be able to return and effectively break any further efforts of Iran to make nuclear weapons,” De Rosh said.

If the Ford remains prompt, Israel’s attacks practically slow down Iran’s ability to build a bomb, nuclear analysts believe. Thus, the solutions of the house in the coming days will be decisive not only for the trajectory of Iran’s nuclear program, but also for the survivability of the Islamic Republic regime as a whole.

Ali Vais, Iran’s project director in a non -profit crisis group, believes that “Iran can survive and restore its nuclear program”, even without diplomatic avenue for the US transaction

“The United States, which is part of the war, will close the diplomacy door,” said CNBC. “Trump could destroy Fordow, but he will not be able to bomb the knowledge that Iran has already acquired.”

Source link