Why are stocks growing after a gloomy job report in August?

Here are two statements that, on the surface, may be controversial:

1. The labor market in the US weakens, with The number of jobs in June is actually decreasing.
2. The American Stock Market is at most over the whole time, with Nasdaq Composite Be Last Index for this Monday.

Why do these premises sit together?

Well, slowing job growth implies an unsuccessful economy, which is usually bad for stocks. When people lose their jobs – or they just feel that they cannot afford to buy goods and services – corporate profit is falling. And these figures are what the stock is on the basis.

But large indices closed on Monday higher, despite the news of the weaker than expected in August. Of course, the prospect of reducing the rate has raised investors’ moods.

However, a more careful view of individual stock movements can give another explanation. Technology firms – and artificial intelligence companies such as Broadcom and NvidiaIn particular – led the rise.

Investors may also refuse the job report in August The appearance of AI will bring not only the loss of workbut also the end Career staircase. Salesforce last week showed it was cut 4000 jobs with -wa IIWhile Claorn in May said II helped the company cut your workforce by approximately 40%.

Thus, the consequences are very speculative and far-fetched! – The fact that work losses can in a sense can show that AI is working on purpose – good for companies, not so much for job seekers.

Private Capital Giants Raid Wall Street because Fund Talented Wars

The private capital set has accelerated in the first half of 2025, led by fundraising, investors’ relations and marketing roles, according to a recent Magellan Consistory Partners report. Wider investment hiring also bounced after two -year freezing or slowing.

This hiring to work comes after the private capital sector has been delayed in the scheme in recent years, when interest rates and market volatility have put brakes on transactions. The leaders of the fund remained with the expanded pipeline of companies that they could not sell, with the conclusions.

. Lee In Shan