Vnes took the lead role, attacking Zelensky. Why?

Excellent dressing JD Vance from Volodimir Zelensky in the Oval office on Friday showed that the US Vice President is not afraid to go out into the central scene as a dog rather than serve as some of his predecessors as a self-proclaimed political unit.

It was Vnes, who led the attack on Zelensky before Donald Trump entered the White House at a meeting that was a heartfelt until the vice president talked to the praise president for describing the diplomatic decision for the war of Ukraine-Russia.

“What diplomacy, JD, are you talking about?” – said Zelensky, who was critical of direct negotiations between Washington and Moscow. “What do you mean?”

“I am talking about the type of diplomacy that will finish the destruction of your country,” Vnes replied, breaking into the stunned Ukrainian leader.

“Mr. President, with respect, I believe that you are disrespectful to come to the Oval Office to try to consider it in front of the American media.”

He also accused Zelensky of campaigning on behalf of the Democrats during the 2024 presidential election. The Ukrainian leader visited the ammunition factory in the critical swing of Pennsylvania last September and met with Trump’s competitor Kamala Harris at the White House.

Vnes’ exit with Zelensky provided extensive support among Republicans.

“I was very proud of JD Vance, which stood for our country,” said South Carolina Lindsey Graham, a longtime supporter of Ukraine and foreign policy. He suggested that Zelensky should resign.

Senator Alabama Tommy Tubersil called Zelensky “that Ukrainian like.”

Congressman Mike Lawyer New York was more measured, saying that the meeting was “missed by the opportunity for both the US and for Ukraine.”

The excellent attack by Vnes on the visited head of state is not characteristic of the US Vice President.

Their work is often – but not always – to help choose the president, and then quietly sit next to the boss. To be faithful to the lieutenant who represents the president on foreign trips – stood, one palpitations, therefore, they say, from the presidency.

The contrast with Trump’s First Vice-Vice, much softer Mike Penz, may not be greater.

But Vens – which is widely regarded as to serve as a substantiation of Trump’s foreign policy instincts – has long been skeptical of Ukraine.

When he ran to the Ohio Senate in 2022, Vnes said the podcast: “I must be honest with you. I really don’t care what is happening to Ukraine anyway.”

The vice-president made fun of Trump as an idiot eight years ago, before the political evolution, which ended with the fact that he became a heir, obvious to the President’s movement again a great movement.

Despite Vnes’ popularity among the conservative voters, Trump recently said in an interview with Fox News that he was “too early” whether the vice-president of the next line would run for the president in 2028.

Negroorous, Vens seems to develop the role of a political scandalist for Trump, going even further than the president in his open criticism of the administration’s enemies.

The only common thread is that many victims of America’s Vens-News ejection.

It began at the Munich Security Conference last month, a regular port for the US Vice President. Kamala Harris often performs invalid speeches there.

But Vnes used this occasion to start a brilliant attack on the state of European democracy, accusing the continental leaders of censorship of free speech and without controlling immigration.

“If you are afraid of your own voters, America can’t do for you,” he said.

Viewers of politicians, generals and diplomats were horrified.

It was not ordinary – and now widely accepted – the argument that Europe must do more to pay for its own protection and safety.

It was a full-scale ideological attack that the United States at Mr. Trump not just abandon Europe, moving attention to China, but also seeks to promote Trump’s own populism on the European continent.

It is not about that Vens have dinner after his speech with the leadership of the Far Right Party.

His speech provoked a return reaction from European leaders, writers and scientists.

However, Vnes decided to take them online, participating in detailed exchanges for X with several, including the historian NIL Ferguson.

Vnes accused him of “moralistic debris”, “historical illiteracy” and – the worst of all – in “globalistic”.

And if it was not enough, Vnes even decided to go to the Prime Minister of the UK in the Oval office itself.

From nowhere, he told Sir Kirey, “there have been free speech violations, which actually affect not only the British – it is known that the British do in their country – but also affect US technology companies and, in expanding, American citizens.”

The Prime Minister pushed back, saying: “I am very proud of our history in the UK … We had freedom of speech for a very long time in the UK, and it will last very, very long.”

It was a response of criticism of Vens, made in Munich, who opposed the European rules on artificial intelligence and social media platforms.

The goal is to fight misinformation and the language of hatred that can ignite the unrest and radicalization of people. Vens perceives this as a threat to the US political travelers, especially in major technologies.

Several questions represent themselves. Was Vena’s attack on Zelensky intentionally, as some diplomats believe?

The White House sources told us the documents that this was not the case.

Does the new role of Vens in the will of Trump, who shares the load with Elon Musk, to avoid the punishment of the president’s opponents?

Or Vance Freelanging, which already sketches the role that will be the basis of the election campaign in three years if Trump is unable to stand again?

Regardless of the answers to these questions, Vnes arises as more than just Trump’s two number.