Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
US Prosecutor General Bondi ordered the prosecutor’s office to open a court case that Donald Trump’s political opponents could speak falsely accusing him of plotting his 2016 presidential election.
According to the US partner BBC CBS News, the prosecutor’s office will present evidence to the large jury – a group of members of the public who will decide whether the official fees will be presented.
It is unclear, however, what these accusations may be and may be accused.
Trump was elected president in the 2016 election, beating the candidate for Hillary Clinton’s democratic substances. He has always accused political enemies of smearing for the so -called allegations of Russians.
Last month, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabard accused former President Barack Obama and his national security group of a “long -standing coup” against Trump.
Gabard claimed that exploration about Russian intervention in the 2016 White House election was politicized From the White House Obama to falsely tie Trump with Russia.
Trump reacted, accusing Obama of “treason” – and the Obama’s press -secretary called this demand “intricate”.
Democrats did not say anything in Gabard’s findings, invalid American intelligence Assessment in January 2017 The conclusion that Russia sought to harm Clinton and increase Trump in voting three months earlier.
Two -party report 2020 The Senate Intelligence Committee also found out that Russia tried to help Trump 2016.
Last month, Fox News reported that ex-director John Brennan and ex-director of FBI James Komi were under a criminal investigation related to Trump-Russia probe. Both have long denied any violations and accused Trump of undermining justice.
Half of Trump’s first presidency was marred by an investigation into his own Ministry of Justice in whether he was agreed with Russia to shake the 2016 result.
As a result of Mueller’s report, there is no evidence that Trump or his campaign was agreed with the Kremlin, and no one was accused of such crimes.
Last week, a discussion about Russia’s was intensified when an addition to the next investigation of the Ministry of Justice was seized.
29 pages John Darem’s special lawyer refers to a memo in March 2016 from a US intelligence source, which states that Hillary Clinton approved a plan to grease Trump as a Russian asset.
Darem refers “to the fact that the original” e -mails that hackers related to Russian intelligence can be obtained from the employee with a non -profit organization, which is managed by Liberal donor George Soros.
One of the reports appears to have been sent by Leonard Beard, Senior Vice President in the Open Society Fund, Soros Charity Hand. This is apparently referred to as a foreign policy advisor Clinton Julian Smith.
The e -mail of July 26, 2016 states: “Julie says it will be a long -term case to Putin and Trump’s demonization. Now it’s good for rebound after the Convention. Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.”
There is nothing illegal in the political smear, but Trump’s allies offered an email when the real one showed that federal investigators could be part of this scheme. Darem, however, did not find evidence of such a conspiracy of the FBI.
According to the app, Beard said to Darem that he did not make an email, although he noted that some verbal down sounded the way he would say.
A special lawyer also interviewed Smith, who said she did not remember how she received such a letter from Beard.
Darem did not determine in his application whether the emails were valid or were their doctor to Russian spies.
Its main report on 306 pages, published in 2023, found that the original FBI probe in Trump lacked “analytical rigor” and relied on a “raw, neore and disobedient intelligence”.
US officials found that Russian intervention in 2016 included farms in social media and hacking democratic letters, but they eventually concluded that the impact was probably limited and did not actually change the election result.
