Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
NewNow you can listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump The approach with Russian President Vladimir Putin blushed sharply this month, when, for the first time after returning to the White House, he not only confirmed the support of Ukraine in the NATO weapons agreement, but also issued an ultimatum to the Kremlin chief.
The warning came to a clear message: conclude a peaceful deal with Ukraine or face to hard International sanctions On its main product, oil sales.
While this step defended some, he is questioned by others who discuss whether it would be enough to restrain Putin’s military ambitions in Ukraine. One security expert claims that the plan will work, but it will take years to be effective.
President Trump talks to Russian President Vladimir Putin during his first term. (Reuters/Jorge Silva)
NATO chief praises Trump’s arms sales ally as a “significant” step that can force Putin to negotiate
“I think it will be effective and it will follow this strategy. It will continue to push Putin to return to the winning table and agree in good faith, and not come to the table that make promises that the Russians do not plan to hold,” said Fred Flets, who spoke at the MP President, said Fox News Digital.
“This is what Trump won’t tolerate,” the flutz added. “We will see that this is only the first six months of Trump’s presidency. It may take a couple of years.”
But Trump campaigned at the end of wars in Ukraine and gas, which turned out to be more difficult than he offered from the campaign. And Not all in the Republican Party He supported his approach when it comes to Europe, including an avid Trump supporter, Martzor Taylor Green.
“We do not want to give and sell weapons to Ukraine either to participate in any foreign wars, or to continue an endless flow of foreign aid,” Green said on X.
Flets pointed to Trump’s decision on Iran’s direct application and claimed it reflects Trump’s ability to be deft as a leader.
“He looked at the exploration and realized that she was too close, and decided to set up her policy, which was the first diplomat,” Flyts said.
“But Trump also identified something very important. He said to his fans,” I came up with the concept of First America to the US national security, and I decide what it is in it, “” Flutzaddz.
President Donald Trump meets with NATO Secretary General Mark Rute at the NATO summit in The Hague, the Netherlands, June 25, 2025. (Reuters/Brian Snyder)
Although Trump made it clear that he wanted Europe to take a leading role in the war in Ukraine, last week he opposed the main conversation from some in his party, including, including Vice -President JD Vance.
Vnes opposed armed Ukraine and said that last year “(this) is not only a question of dollars. In principle, we lack the opportunity to produce the number of weapons of Ukraine, which requires us to ensure the war.”
Trump agreed to sell NATO nation Above American weapons, which will then be delivered to Ukraine.
“We want to defend our country. But, ultimately, having a strong Europe is a very good thing,” said Trump, sitting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rute.
Security experts greatly claim that the future of Ukraine’s negotiation abilities and, ultimately, the end of the war will be Play on the battlefield.
On Thursday, John Hardi, Deputy Director for the Russian FDD program, told us to the legislators in the Helsinki Commission, also known as the Security and Cooperation Commission in Europe, at a briefing for the defense Ukraine It is necessary to provide long -range strike that can hit key missiles and drones.
In June 2024, Ukrainian and German soldiers trained on the air defense missile system in military training in Germany. (Jens Büttner/Alliance Picture Alliance through Getty Images)
“Trump has changed the game”: NATO enters the brave new era under pressure from the US, Russia
“Ukraine should not be limited only to beating a” shot “,” said Hardy. “The optimal approach combines both crime and protection. Ukraine needs to be able to hit “archers” and factories that make “shots”.
“Putin will continue his unpredictable war as long as he thinks it is steadily and offers the way to achieve its goals,” Hardy claimed. “Cuspling Ukraine’s defense from its sky and allowing Ukraine to rise in the cost of Russia’s military machine, as well as press the Russian economy and grunting Offensive Russia Potential on Earth, we can change this calculation. “
But the flicker, which holds the position of Vice -Chairman of the Center for America of the First Politics on US Security, said he believes that this war would be brought to the end only if the Agricultural Agreement is provided.
“I think there will probably be a truce if both parties agree to suspend the fighting,” Flyts said. “If -we will find a line if both countries agree to stop fighting.”
Ultimately he believes it will happen to Ukraine who agrees Don’t join NATO During a certain period of time, though with the understanding of Moscow that Kiev will be strongly armed with Western allies.
In this photo, presented by the Ukrainian press service of the President, President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky, the case, and President Donald Trump, talking when they visit Pope Francis’ funeral in the Vatican on April 26, 2025. (Ukrainian press service of the President via AP)
Click here to get the Fox News app
“I think there is a way to do this if Russia is not concerned about the strengthening of Western European influence in Ukraine, and Ukraine will not worry that Russia is invaded after a ceasefire or truce is announced,” he added. “Perhaps it’s a pipe dream, but I think this is the most realistic way to stop fighting.
“We know that of such conflicts similar to this time, it takes time; peacekeeping takes time,” the fleece said. “I think Trump will affect Putin over time.”
