Trump tariffs are restored when the legal battle breaks out

The tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, which were withdrawn by the trade court, will remain in place, while the case is through the courts.

On Thursday, the Appeal Court of the Federal District provided a White House to suspend the lower court decision, which found that Trump had exceeded its power in import taxes.

The court decision and the like decision on Thursday in a separate case were attracted by the fury from Trump officials, who stated that they were examples of the court overcoming.

Small business and a group of states challenged measures, aiming at Trump’s economic and international programs.

In its appeal, the Trump administration stated that the decision issued by the trade court incorrectly attracted the president and threatened to unravel the months of tough trade negotiations.

“Political branches, not courts, make foreign policy and economic policy schedules,” the application that threatened to seek emergency assistance from the Supreme Court if the ruling was not stopped.

“America cannot work if President Trump or any other president, on this account, has his sensitive diplomatic or trade talks held in railway judges,” said White House Socialist Caroline Levitt on Thursday.

The eruption of the legal battle raised new questions about the fate of the tariffs that shocked the world economy, as the White House began threatening measures earlier this year.

In February, Trump ordered tariffs for goods from China, Mexico and Canada, saying that this step was intended to resolve the fentany crisis.

Last month, he presented a 10% tariff for goods from most countries, with higher duties on products of some trading partners, including the European Union and China, considered the administration of “bad actors”.

Since then, the White House has suspended parts of many of these orders, while it is in trading talks.

In order to impose tariffs under consideration, Trump used an international law on emergency economic powers, a law that is usually applied in cases of trade sanctions, such as in Iran.

Those who challenge the case stated that the law did not give him such a broad power for trade and tax policy, traditionally the responsibility of Congress.

This was careful about the issues of the limit of the presidential power, which Trump repeatedly checked after re -joining the office in January.

Ilya Somin’s lawyer, who helped to work on the case initiated by the enterprises before the trade court, stated that he was “defending” that the ruling would be supported by the appeal, noting that the ruling on the trade court came from the judges appointed by both democratic and republican presidents.

“It is not normal for the United States president to force such a great capture of power and start the biggest trade war after the Great Depression,” he said.

But Terry Hainens, founder of Pangea policy, who advises politics in Washington, said the decision could eventually change the situation where the higher courts have taken the case.

“All these things will be considered, and the president will probably benefit the doubt,” he said.

Goldman Sachs analysts and other firms have stated that Trump would most likely look for other ways to justify tariffs when the administration loses the case.

Other tariffs he took from the time of returning to the office on certain materials such as steel, aluminum and cars have not been legal.

Business owners, expressing relief, stated that they did not feel that the situation was resolved.

“I was incredibly happy and relieved, but I’m also very careful,” said Daier Kara, Time Time Time Time Time Time Time Time Time Time, which makes toys in China and imported them to the US for sale.

“It was just a chaotic and impossible to plan as a business,” she said.

“I want it to go through our judicial system, so we have a little more confidence in what tariffs will be in the future.”

However, this process is played, Dmitry Grozubinsky, a former trade negotiator who represented Australia in the World Trade Organization, said the decision would complicate the White House suddenly impose tariffs, weakening Trump’s ability to use duties for other countries.

“It will be much more difficult for him to raise tariffs in the future,” he said. “In the end, these were negotiations in which President Trump threatened other countries with a large stick, and this regiment just became much more ephemeral.”

With reports from the BBC World Report and Bell Opening.