The Supreme Court rules the fact that immigration raids in Los -Angeles may continue

The US Supreme Court ruled to rethink immigration raids in Los -Angeles, may continue by raising an order of the federal judge who forbade the agents to stop without “reasonable suspicion”.

The ruling on Monday is a victory for President Donald Trump, who promised to deport migrants at the country’s record level illegally.

The 6-3 Conservative Most decision allows agents to stop suspects, based solely on their race, language or work, while the legal task of recent immigration in Los Angeles goes through courts.

Liberal judges disagree, saying that the decision threatens constitutional freedoms.

In the Monday decision, Bret Coatanus wrote that the lower court order went too far, limiting how immigration and customs agents (ICE) may stop or ask suspected illegal migrants.

“To be clear, only the obvious ethnicity cannot give reasonable suspicion,” he wrote. “However, this can be a” appropriate factor “when viewed with other notable factors.”

Three liberal judges of the Supreme Court made a strong disagreement written by justice Sonia Sotomer, who wrote that “countless people in the Los -Andgeles area were grabbed, thrown on the ground and handcuffed simply from their appearance, their accents, and what they earn.”

“Today, the court is unnecessary to be countless,” she wrote.

The decision overturns the ruling of the US district judge Maam E Frimpong in Los -Angeles, which stated that there is a “mountain of evidence” that show that raids violate the US Constitution.

In July, Judge Frimpong ordered to stop the raids, and stated that the Trump administration could not count on factors such as “obvious race or ethnicity” or “talking to -Spanish” just to stop or interrogate people.

His order also banned the immigration bodies to carry out stops based exclusively at whose presence “in a certain place” as a stop, agricultural platform or car wash, or based solely on the type of work that a person does.

He issued an order in the legal call of immigration groups, who claimed that the immigration officers in the Los -Angeles were conducting “patrols” indiscriminately and denied access to lawyers.

Judge Frimpong said this could violate the fourth amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits governments with unreasonable searches and confiscations.

The Supreme Court, however, stated that federal courts have a good chance in the actions of the administration.

The lawyers of the Internal Security Department claim that immigration staff is aimed at people based on their legal status in the US, not skin color, race and ethnicity.

They also stated that Judge Frimpong’s order incorrectly restricted the work of ice.

The Trump administration began to sweep immigration raids in Los -Andeles in June, stopping and launching people at the depot at home and other jobs, and they were met with urgent protests and civic unrest.

Then Trump accommodated almost 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines, without permission from California.

Since then, the federal judge has ruled that the deployment of the National Guard has been illegal. The White House replied that the “judge -fake judge is trying to usurp the” President’s authorities “to protect US cities from violence and destruction.”

The US Supreme Court’s decision will allow the raids to continue the raids when Trump’s administration seeks to increase law enforcement in other cities, including Washington.

In August, Trump ordered the National Guard troops in the US capital to decide what, he said, is a high crime in the city, and uses federal officers to strengthen the district law enforcement agencies.

He now indicates that he will decide whether he will also send the Federal Law Enforcement and the National Guard in Chicago.