The retirement requirement makes me want to die young

By Drewsch
| Announce 1 minute ago

Recently reviewed Happy Gilmore 2 And I spoke about the Requel, a term for sequence movies but acts as a restart or soft red -make original film. Not only did Happy Gilmore 2 Falling into this category, but also included another aspect of legacy sequences that become depressed: the wheel out of older actors to dress up as recognized characters.

Then I saw the trailer for Spinal Tap II: The end continuesand decided to fragment a term: the retirement requirement.

No shadow toward the actors

Let me get one thing out of the way first before people go crazy: I’m not against older actors getting work at all. I know that it can get much more difficult for actors to get work as they get older. I’m glad that these types of projects get them gigs, but I would rather have much that they will be able to produce original projects instead of relying on so much longing. I also want the studio system to be more welcoming older actors in more obvious and consistent roles, so I recognize that it is a systemic issue and not the actors’ fault.

So nothing is about what I’m about to criticize with these actors who take these jobs, got it?

Saddle Legacy

When Ghostbusters: Afterlife and Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire After coming out, I saw some scenes with the old cast and had no effect intended on me. Instead of filling me with fun for returning these dear characters, it made me sad to see them playing this particular dress decades later to keep their bank account flushing. Same to Harrison Ford and John Rhys-Davies Indiana Jones and dial fate.

The mindset of the retirement requirement leaves the potential for a less dignified legacy for so many of these projects. And that’s where my real digestion comes in after watching that trailer Spinal Tap II: The end continues.

The same old song and dance

If this trailer is representative of the finished cut of Spinal Tap II: The end continuesHe portrays a pale imitation of comedy that is still cast out of the park over four decades later. It feels like a bad excuse to get this company back together again for a lazy re -reading instead of a strong creative effort.

As capitalism continues its flowering towards an explosion, we are going to see many of our stories and identifiable performers put back in the meat grinder. And more often than not, he is going to churn some rotten beef that people puddles. Take (an oath) The exorcist: A believer And his use of Ellen Burstyn is like another retirement example, and seeing how audiences were back on screen. It was so irritating that he killed a scheme trilogy of films!

Therefore, there may be hope that audiences will begin to recognize the faults of the more and more retirement requirement as their ropes become familiar. I want to see these older actors on screen, but not if it means making a half -donkey cosplay of a role I loved in years and years ago.