Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Harry, Hermione and Ron may have had a pot full of Gryffindor house points over the years, but they only managed to get access to one movie IMDb Top 250 list, and it might not be the one you’re thinking of. In the pantheon of “Harry Potter” films that saw the orphan and number one horcrux Daniel Radcliffe side by side with He Who Must Not Be Named aka Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes), there are plenty of great watches to choose from. Some that might not have aged as well as others and some that might sit lower down the list, but have a handful of memorable moments anyway. However, according to IMDb users, the last half of the final chapter in the “Harry Potter” franchise, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2,” deserves a slot among the select few.
Back in 2011, the world was eagerly watching to see if director David Yates would pull off the magic trick that was a live adaptation of JK Rowling’s beloved story, and he did it brilliantly. “Deathly Hallows: Part 2” ended up grossing over $1.34 billion at the worldwide box office, which helped make Yates one of the highest paid directors in film history. But what is it about “Death Hallows: Part 2” that works so well, and does it deserve to be ahead of not only the other “Harry Potter” films but also films like “Ben-Hur,” “Blade Runner,” and even “Jaws” on IMDb? Well, to be honest, it’s not, but as the film that capped off a huge cinematic feat, it certainly deserves its props.
Much like “Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King” and “Avengers: Endgame,” the second half of “Deathly Hallows” deserves credit simply for the present. Yates’ final trip to Hogwarts with Harry and his friends is not only a last-ditch push against Voldemort and his army, but also completes a decade’s worth of filmmaking magic itself. We watched Radcliffe along with Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, and a school full of children grow up before our eyes, transform as people and actors as Harry finally waved the Elder Wand, he brought some extra weight. We were saying goodbye to a true era of film that had dominated theaters since 2001 (and which Warner Bros. struggled to recapture with the prequels that followed).
No other “Harry Potter” movie contains as many stakes, drama, grief and triumph as “Deathly Hallows: Part 2,” ending with the Boy Who Lived beating death itself and the monster that stooped upon presentation. At the same time, there’s a reason “Deathly Hallows: Part 2” just made the top five / Own movie site from the “Harry Potter” movies. The truth is that the real winner of the franchise itself is a much darker and absolutely gorgeous addition – one that comes with a lot more Gary Oldman too.
Before Warner Bros. settled on giving Yates the keys to the Wizarding World for seven films (including three “Fantastic Beasts” films), there was a time when the director’s chair was refilled with every episode of Harry’s adventures. In 2004, however, Alfonso CuarĂ³n brought a darker, darker edge to this fantastical universe when it was absolutely necessary, courtesy of “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.”
The third installment in the “Harry Potter” franchise refines almost every issue that the previous two films had. In particular, Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint really found their footing as actors playing the core heroic trio of the property, bouncing brilliantly between each other during a story that plays like a true mystery (one that even the those who are well educated in the ways). of the Potter-verse can be caught up trying to solve).
There are also the added nightmarish elements such as Remus Lupine (David Thewlis) – a Hogwarts professor with a horrible secret – and Gary Oldman portraying Harry’s potentially murderous godfather, Sirius Black. By simply putting Thewlis and Oldman together in a room with Alan Rickman chewing up the scenery as Harry’s not-so-supportive teacher Severus Snape, the film even manages to deliver the best scene in the entire “Harry Potter” franchise.. Many people peaked in high school, but “Prisoner of Azkaban” is the closest the “Harry Potter” franchise has come so far to delivering a perfect fantasy film.