The MEENDEZ brothers’ application for freedom may continue, the judge of the rules

The submitted hearing of the Meendessa brothers can move forward, despite the opposition of the district’s prosecutor, the court in Los -Andeles ruled.

The brothers’s lawyers are trying to come to a shorter term that they can potentially make their right to freedom.

Eric and Lail were convicted of killing parents in Bverley -Hills in 1989, a notorious case that still shares Americans. They are currently serving life in prison without the possibility of parole in California.

The ruling on Friday means a couple of loud hearings next week to decide whether the defendants will continue.

The Los -Angeles district prosecutor Nathan Hochman expressed severe couples after his predecessor sent the process immediately before the November election.

The brothers’ efforts are based on the law of California, which allows certain prisoners who were under the age of 26 at the time of their crimes to achieve a cliff and parole -acknowledging that brain development continues in the mid -20s.

If the brothers would resent a 50 -year -old life as they asked, it would make them immediately accept the right to parole.

Lale and Eric Menendez appeared for remote hearing through a video of the San Diego prison. Both were dressed in a blue jail and sometimes nervous – looking down, swaying in chairs and breathed deeply – when the prosecutor’s office talked about graphic details of the killings.

The district prosecutor’s office claimed that while prosecutors could recognize the prisoners rehabilitated, being behind bars, the act of violation of someone should be used with caution.

Deputy District Prosecutor Habib Balian criticized the former to George Gasconus, whose support is seeking to move forward.

He said the decision of the Gasconda announced the support of the brothers, which would be present immediately before the November election, which Gaskon lost to Hochman with a great break was politically managed.

The DA office claims that the brothers did not take responsibility and continued to perceive the lies in the case to shed the guilt.

Mark Geragos, the lawyer of the Meendessa brothers, claimed that the district prosecutor’s office was more concerned about the re -leaf of the previous trial and did not study that the couple had been in prison in the last 35 years.

The couple graduated from the school while behind bars and worked to start rehabilitation programs for disabled and elderly prisoners, as well as with imprisonment, he said.

The judge ruled that the prosecutor’s office did not show why the tendency efforts should not continue and emphasized the importance of maintaining the sequence even when changing the leadership.

“No new information,” the judge said. “None of this is not quite new. They are stuck with their story. It goes on whether they were rehabilitated.”

The right was drop back into the eye of the public Last year new evidence and release appeared New Drama Netflix, Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez.

The series introduced the case with the new generation and caught the attention of celebrities – including Kim Kardashian and Rosie O’Donnell, who called for the release of the brothers.

Legal experts say that the results on the Meendez brothers hearings may have several forms, depending on how the judge manages.

The easiest way would be to refuse to refuse at all by leaving your current sentence – life without the possibility of parole. This is the final prosecutor of the Los -Andgeles County Nattan Hochman, who seeks, arguing the brothers, did not accept the full responsibility for their crimes, and therefore do not claim the reduced term.

Alternatively, the court could, on the side with the previous recommendations of the former George Gascone and the grievance of the brothers up to 50 years old. This would allow them to receive the right to parole immediately, as they had already served for more than 30 years. But the fitness does not guarantee the release; They will still need to convince the Parish Council that they no longer pose a danger to society.

Another opportunity is that the judge chooses a changed sentence that reduces their punishment, but does not immediately open the door to the parole. In this case, the brothers could face a few more years behind bars before getting right.

The correct application is one of the three routes that the brothers have been chasing in recent months in the hope of release.

California Gov Gavin Newsom still weighs another option: providing brothers pardon.

Newsom said the brothers had to appear before the State Council of Parole on June 13 to discuss the findings of the risk assessment he ordered by studying whether Eric and Lale represented.

Depending on the results, the governor could put a pardon by going to his sentences to make their right to parole or even release them immediately.

The third route that the brothers looked – asking for a new lawsuit – got into the checkpoint when Hochman’s office announced that he would oppose it.