Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A federal judge has rejected Blake livelyClaims against a social public relations expert Jed Wallace as her legal battle with Justin Baldoni continues.
According to court documents obtained by Weekly USJudge Lewis Liman Wallace’s proposal was given to dismiss himself as a defendant in the case without prejudice.
The judge referred to a lack of jurisdiction in his decision to throw Wallace and his street relations company from the case, noting that he was located in Texas and not New York, where Lively’s legal proceedings were filed.
In his opinion obtained by Us.
In response to the ruling, Lively’s team said the actress “respected” the latest award.
“Ms Lively respects the court’s decision, which is not about the merits of his claims about Mr. Wallace’s role in the cervical campaign and is just about the procedural question whether it is the subject of jurisdiction in New York or elsewhere,” a spokesperson for a lively shared lively shared is shared lively Weekly US On Wednesday, July 16.
Weekly US reached out to the Baldoni team for comments. Wallace representative could not be reached for comments.
Blake lively
Taylor Hill/FilmmagicLively has until Thursday, July 31, to file a revised complaint or Sue Wallace in a different jurisdiction.
Lively and Baldoni’s Legal drama Began in December 2024, when the actress accused her It ends with us Costar and director of sexual harassment, creating a hostile work environment and creating a cervical campaign bespoke against her.
Lively suddenly sued Baldoni, his publicity team and a series of other defendants who claimed she was revenge against her for the sexual harassment allegations.
Baldoni strongly denied the allegations and counteracted lively. In June, however, judge dismiss his legal case against the actress.
Lively claimed that Wallace was employed because he was involved in “untreated” campaigns across social media platforms. He also claimed that he was employed to “equip a digital army” to “create, seed, treat and promote dazzling content.”
In February 2025, Wallace suddenly suddenly sung for defamation after she named his company in her civil rights complaint in California, filed in December 2024. She seeks at least $ 7 million and ordered a court stating that she did not participate in harassment or avenge against the actress.