The Court of Appeal temporarily allows Trump to keep the National Guard in Los -Angeles

The Court of Appeal temporarily blocked the order of the federal judge, which ordered the Trump administration to return control over the troops of the California National Guard back to the state.

The decision of the appeal court came a few hours after the federal judge stated that the deployment of Trump troops in Los Eandgeles to stop immigration raids was illegal.

Trump said he sends troops – which are usually under the rule of the governor – to stop L.A. From “burning” in protest against his repression.

California Governor Gavin News and other local officials have rejected the move and stated that it was an unnecessary provocation. The Court of Appeal said a hearing will be held on Tuesday.

At the preliminary hearing of the Federal Court, Judge Charles Brayer stated that the issue presented in California is whether Trump adhered to the legislation appointed by Congress on the deployment of the National Guard.

“He is not,” the judge wrote in his decision. “His actions were illegal … Therefore, he should return control of the California National Guard of the Governor of California right away.”

But the judge remained the order until Friday afternoon to give Trump administration time to appeal it. The administration did so almost immediately after issuing the order.

On Thursday, Newsom posted on social media that “the court simply confirmed that we all know – the military belongs to the battlefield, not on our city streets.”

Trump’s administration said it took the National California Guard to resume order and protect the immigration and customs agents (ICE) when they swept from people in the Los, who are believed to be illegally in the country.

Despite NEWSOM’s objections, Trump has ordered a total of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to help stop the excitement. Some of the defense troops are now authorized to detain people until the police can arrest them.

The last time the president launched the National Guard without the consent of the governor more than 50 years ago – in the Civil Rights Age. For the governor most often activates troops to combat spontaneous disasters and other extraordinary situations, and then asks for federal assistance.

A prosecutor of the Ministry of Justice told Judge Breiera in front of the courtroom on Thursday that Newsom did not need to be addressed when Trump issued an order.

“The Newsom Governor was fully aware of this order … He objected to this,” Bret Schumum said. “There is one commander -in -chief of the US Armed Forces.”

“No,” said Judge Brayer, the younger brother of the former Supreme Court Stephen Brayer.

“The president is not a commander -in -chief in the National Guard,” he said, but added that there were times and situations where the president could become the head of the troops.

Breer, who put on a light -blue fight, addressed the Constitution several times, at one point delaying a copy of the document.

“We are talking about the president who powers his powers. And the president is, of course, limited in his authorities,” he said. “This is the difference between the Constitutional Government and King George.”

Prior to the judge’s decision, defense secretary Pete Hegset repeatedly refused to say whether he would obey Judge Brayer’s order.

“What I can say is that we should not have local judges who determine foreign policy or national security policy for the country,” said Ggset, speaking at the House of Representative Committee’s hearings on Thursday.

HEGSET said he would comply with the Supreme Court ruling.

At the end of Thursday, the decision of the Appeal Court allows the troops of the National Guard to remain in the Los -Angeles because the case conducts it through the courts.

The Trump administration used a law that allows the president to summon the National Guard to the Federal Service when the “uprising” takes place.

But California said she stated in her lawsuit that the protests that covered almost a week in the Los -Andez and included more than 300 arrests and the shutdown of a large freeway – did not rise to this level.

“By no means did the uprising or the uprising occur. And these protests have not raised to the level of protests and unrest that Los -Andgeles and other major cities have seen in points in the past, including in recent years,” the lawsuit said.

Additional Ana Faguy report in Washington, Colombia County