The confrontation between the Prime Minister and the spy reveals the deepening of Israel

The speech between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the head of the internal exploration agency Ronne Bar has increased even more, and each person accused the other of lying or inaccuracies of the name.

Netanyahu announced the dismissal of lawyers last month, but the Attorney General and the opposition appealed to the Supreme Court, which now effectively froze him.

On Sunday, Netanyahu made a statement for a court in which he called a liar bar.

Then the statement was made from the bar a few days earlier, in which he accused the Prime Minister of demanding personal loyalty and order Shin Bet to spy on anti-government protesters.

The confrontation further exposed the in -depth gaps in Israeli policy and society between the right and the brutal, supporting Netanyahu and more liberal elements in the country that took to the streets to protest against the government to stop the powers of judicial information over the months before Hamas’s attack on October 7, 2023.

It is focused on Netanyahu’s perseverance so he fired Shin Bet’s head for professional setbacks.

The bar was opposed by saying that his dismissal was motivated by political and personal opinions.

In his statement last week, the spy chief stated that “it is clear” that if there was a constitutional crisis, Netanyahu would expect that he obeys the Prime Minister, not by the courts.

He also said Netanyahu put pressure on him to use the Shin bet to spy on Israelis leading or provided financial support for anti -government protests.

Many in Israel responded with anxiety, saying that it was a testament to the fact that it seemed unprecedented efforts to overcome the powers of the internal intelligence agency.

Now, in his statement, which operates as a form of rebuttal, Netanyahu in turn rejected Shin Bet’s head.

“The accusation, according to which I allegedly demanded actions against innocent civilians, or against non-violent and legitimate protest during the 2023 protests, is an absolute lie,” he said.

Netanyahu also prepared his sights on security failures as a result and during the attacks on October 7, saying that the bar was “large -scale and direct responsibility” for them and “fell into the role of the Beta Tire Chief and lost confidence in the whole Israeli government as far as its ability to continue management.”

The bar immediately replied in the kind of statement, stating that the statement of Netanyahu was “full inaccuracies, prejudice quotes and semi -proclaims aimed at bringing things out of context and change reality.”

In order to decide on the dismissal of the lawyers, the Supreme Court may make the choice between which of the two contradictory testimonies.

Either the court may seek to defam the crisis to a certain extent by finding the mechanism and the date with which the lawyers can agree to withdraw from office,

But the problems that were exposed in rigid leaves between two men again focused on the growing bitterness between the opposite sections of Israeli society.

They were additionally worsened by the constantly growing line of faults between those who support Netanyahu and its harsh government in desire to continue the war in gas to eliminate Hamas at all costs, and those who believe that the fate of living Israeli hostages that are still held by Hamas should be at first, even if it means to stop the war.