Texas man sues California, doctor by mail with abortion in the iconic case

A male in Texas filed a significant federal lawsuit against the illegal death against Californian abortion supplierclaiming that the doctor “killed” his unborn children, sending pills for abortion through state lines.

To the right, rodriguez v. Coeytaux, notes the first of its kind to check how far about life’s lawsuits can go to Sidestep Blue State Abiort SHSS using using Centuries Federal Statutes and the Texas Civil Code.

Posted on July 20 in the South District of Texas, the lawsuit accuses Dr. Remy Coet of helping illegal abortions in 2024, sending drugs that caused abortion to Galvestan district, Texas, where they were allegedly used to stop two pregnancy.

Plaintiff Jerry Rodriguez claims that the remote husband of his girl purchased pills in Coeytaux through the Venmo transaction and pressed on her to take them by completing two pregnancies that Rodriguez said he was.

Federal Judge partially blocks a law that prohibits adults to assist minors

The ultrasonic image since January 18, 2025, allegedly showing the unborn son Jerry Rodriguez. Submitted as an exhibit 2 in Rodriguez v. Coeytaux in South Texas District. (Image filed in the District Court of the United States, Southern Texas)

The costume is based on the payment of Venmo at $ 150 to “Remy Coeytaux MD PC” with the inscription “AED”, and the name of his girl. The lawsuit states that Rodriguez interprets “AED axes” as a phonetic spelling network that helps women get abortion pills.

Rodriguez claims that the first abortion occurred in September 2024 at the House of His Girl and the second in January 2025 at her remote husband’s house. Ultrasonic images since January, attached as an exhibit 2, offered as proof of the second pregnancy. According to the complaint, the baby was a boy.

Rodriguez is looking for losses of over $ 75,000, certification of the national class of “unborn children” and a permanent ban that prohibits coeytaux from sending drug abortions with violations of the state or federal law.

Medical groups call on Kennedy, FDA review the extensive approval of abortion drugs

MIFPREX and Misoprostol are two drugs used in abortion. (Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images)

The legal fund of complaint has attracted attention. The lawsuit revives the Law on Prolonged Kumstak, the federal law on the fight against the fight against the 1873 fight, which prohibits sending materials related to abortion. Although the infrequent more than a century, the Komstok act remains in the books.

Jonathan Mitchell, the lawyer behind The law on the palpitation of Texas (SB8), represents Rodriguez in case. He claims that Dr. Remy Coate violated 18 § 1461 and 1462 USC, the federal law on Konstak, deliberately using the mail to send drugs that cause an abortion from California to Texas.

The lawsuit also states that Coeytaux committed a crime within the Texas Criminal Code § 19.02, will consciously help with illegal abortion. It refers to numerous violations of the Texas law, including the statutes that require abortion releases in government doctors, after informed consent and mandatory ultrasound and only with licensed abortions. Coeytaux, which has no license in Texas, is allegedly not in line with any of these requirements.

Three years after DOBBS movement is still faced with high abortion rates

People for and against abortion demonstrate before the US Supreme Court in Washington, District Colombia (Alison Robbert/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

The case is already seen as a strategic test of the Blue State Cuttings. States such as California, New York and Washington have taken steps to protect their abortion suppliers from legal risks in the treatment of patients outside the state.

But Rodriguez’s legal team avoided these blocks, fileing a civil illegal death lawsuit directly in the federal court, and some legal scientists say some legal scientists may offer a new route for claimants against abortions to get to suppliers outside their own state.

As of Friday, the court records show that Coeytaux did not file a complaint, and he made no public statements on the case.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Abortion groups are expected to challenge both the interpretation of the Comstock law and the standing of private citizens to make the illegal death requirements associated with the invited healthcare recipes.

If the case is outlived by early procedural obstacles, it can offer a new template for court proceedings that take life to navigate the supply chain of abortion pills three years after Dobbs has been resolved in the Supreme Court.

Coeytaux did not immediately respond to the Fox News Digital request.