Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Of course, there are many various factors to include here. For example, Rotten Tomatoes did not officially launched until 2000, and did not become a remarkable cultural force until about 2003 or 2004. The website has more reviews of newer films than older ones, which go to weight approval scales. “Strange New Worlds,” for example, has 87 reviews, while “Star Trek: The Animated Series” (third, with an approval score of 94%) gets only 18. Also, there is a lot of newer show approval score based solely on reviews of their first few chapters, and they do not stand as a general litigation of the fact post. The ’90s shows were judged in their entirety, while “Strange New Worlds” was judged by five episodes.
“Star Trek: The Next Generation” was fourth on the RT list with an approval rating of 91%, while “Deep Space Nine” was almost fastened “lower decks” with an approval of 91%, only with fewer reviews.
Oddly enough, less appealing Nu-Trek shows like “Star Trek: Discovery” and “Star Trek: Picard” still hosted a lot of positive response, at least to start. “Picard” has an approval score of 89%, bringing it in at #7, while “Disco,” the first NU-Trek series, 8th with 84. These shows are fought enthusiastically, and /Film has recorded why they don’t work very well. Coming in behind them, rather bafflingly, was the original “Star Trek” series in 1966, with only 80%approval. That’s based on 42 reviews, however, some of them old.
At the bottom of the list “Star Trek: Voyager” (76%) is #10, and finally, “Star Trek: Enterprise” (56%).
NU-TREK shows can explode for this: On average, they have an approval of 91.8%. Fans of the original two shows can take comfort knowing that their average is 87%, but the 90s Trek fans will be hurt to learn that their four shows average out to 78.75%.
