Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The signing of a peace agreement between the governments of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda in Washington caused ambiguous reactions when former Congolese President Joseph Kabila called it “no more than a trade agreement”.
The deal is signed on Friday He demanded the “disconnection, disarmament and conditional integration” of armed groups fighting the Eastern Doctor of Congo – but offered several other details.
While some, including Kabila, were critical, others perceive the agreement as a turning point of the devastating conflict that has been going on for decades.
Rwanda denied allegations that he supports an armed group known as M23 fighting the Eastern Congo.
The conflict increased earlier this year, when the M23 had confiscated control over the Eastern Doctor of Congo, including the regional capital, Gomo, Bukov and two airports.
Thousands of people were killed and hundreds of thousands of civilians are forced from their houses after the recent rebel offensive.
Following the loss of the territory, Doctor Congo’s government appealed to the US for help, offering access to critical minerals in exchange for security guarantees. Eastern D -R Congo is rich in colton and other resources that are vital for the global electronics industry.
In a report on X, after signing the Cabila on Friday, he questioned the choice of the participants of the transaction, saying that Dr. Congo does not fight with the states drawn in the photo of the signing, which included President Donald Trump and other US officials, as well as Rwand’s foreign minister.
It is not quite clear whether his comments were indirect criticism of the absence of M23 representatives in Washington.
“We must stop the distortion of facts to mask the propaganda program,” Kabila said, adding that “Congolese people deserve truth, not a diplomatic show.”
The absence of M23 representatives was also noted in the Homo’s custodian on the eastern Dr. Congo.
“How can they say they sign peace but did not participate in M23?” The elderly interrogation, adding the rebels, had to be included in the “Collective World” talks.
Another resident, a commercial motorcycle racer, said the BBC: “People are tired, they are not interested in negotiations,” insisting that “all they want is peace.”
He claimed that preliminary peace talks and agreements were not approved or implemented by conflicting parties, leaving little hope for returning to normality.
Similarly, Sam Zarif, Executive Director of the Human Rights Medicians (PHR), an international public organization that has worked in the DRC for more than ten years, said the Washington conclusion agreement was full of “major drawbacks”.
“There can be no lasting peace without considerable justice. But the agreement … In the side of human rights and does not use survivors,” Mr. Zarif said.
He added: “The agreement does not notice how hostilities can continue through the proxy groups that showed our research, responsible for serious violations.”
Stephanie Marung, head of the Homo Humanities, was more positive.
“Signing a transaction … This is a significant and reliable development for the eastern region,” she said, adding that it could “lead to an increase in stability, and it will make us easier to help and access those in need.” However, she admits that there may be problems in the transaction.
“If the agreement is something that will bring peace, we have no problems,” said another resident.
It remains to find out what situation on the ground will go forward, with a concerned Washington deal can simply enrich several people with the country’s mineral resources to the detriment of ordinary people.