Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
More than 100 British officials, including special forces and Mi6 members, have been compromised in violation of the data, which also threatens thousands of Afghans, can be reported.
The last loss of the violation was kept secret until Thursday, when the order was partially abolished by the judge of the Supreme Court.
This allowed the media -organization to reveal that detailed notes in the database contained secret personal data of special forces and spies.
The government has already recognized almost 19,000 Afghans who worked with the British during the 20-year-old Afghan war on Tuesday and applied for cross-section in the UK.
Many considered the risk of serious harm or even death, as the Taliban sought to pay off those who worked with the British government during the conflict.
This was the reason that the information was protected by the so-called “super-harmful”-peculiar order that prevents reporting even about the existence of the ban.
The BBC realizes that the man was previously rejected for resettlement but was brought to the UK after placing names from Facebook data and showing that he could release the rest.
The Ministry of Defense (MOD) refused to comment on the actions of the person, but stated that “everyone who comes to the UK under any Afghan resettlement scheme” must undergo “reliable security checks to get entry.”
The opening of the violation in 2023 forced the government to set up the response route in Afghanistan (ARR) – a resettlement scheme for those who were injured, who were not told about the violation, despite the risk to their safety.
The scheme has already allowed 4,500 Afghan and family members to move to the UK, and another 2,400 people are expected, about £ 850 million.
The accidental leak was the result of the fact that someone who works at the Special Forces headquarters in the UK in London, unintended by sending more than 30,000 applications to a person outside the government, thinking that only 150 people are sending.
After lifting super-pigs on Tuesday, the secondary ban prevented exposing on the special security forces and security services.
But it was also shot on Thursday that the lawyers representing the fashion and the media group have reached a compromise, which meant that journalists could report additional facts.
On Tuesday, Defense Minister John Hill told Parliament that the violation was a “serious departmental mistake” and acknowledged that it was “only one of the many data losses” concerning Afghan relocation schemes.
Shadow Defense Minister James Cartlidge apologized on behalf of the former conservative government, which was in power when the leak was discovered.
The fashion refused to say how many people in Afghanistan may have suffered as a result of data violation. The Taliban government said on Thursday that he did not arrest or control the Afghans who had suffered from the leak.
But the relatives of the Afghans specified in the leak told BBC that they are afraid of their family in the countryWith one who speaks the Taliban to find a named relative, reinforced after leakage.
The MOD press secretary said: “This is a long -standing policy of consecutive governments that do not comment on the special forces.
“We perceive the safety of our staff very seriously, especially those who are in sensitive positions and always have appropriate measures to protect their safety.”
