Sachin tendulkar finally reacts to the hand drama of Ben Stokes in Manchester test

Legendary Indian Cricter Sachin tendulkar He finally talked about the controversial advertising that was deployed during the fourth test between England and India in Manchester. It Incident, which involved the captain of England, Ben Stokes and the Indians Ravindra Jadja and Washington SundarHe lit a fierce debate about the spirit of the cricket and the competitive tactics during the Anderson-Tendulkar trophy, which finally ended in a draw of the 2-2 series.

The Incident in Hand Cop: Drama to Manchester

The drama began during the closing stages of the fourth test at Old Trafford, Manchester. With India, who was decidedly out of a tie, and Jadja and Sundar approach their hundreds, Stokes approached the Indian couple, which suggested a helping hand to conclude the drawn party. However, Jadja politely rejected Stokes’s offer, as he and Sundar were eager to complete his centuries before accepting to end the party. This decision caused online discussions and opinions of the old cricketers, dividing the world of cricketing into the sportsmanship of the event.

The tensions shot briefly: after the two Indians pointed to their milestones and officially settled a tie, Stokes abstained from joining the post-Partite hand in the field. This left Jadja, according to furious, with an ice cream exchange of words. The episode became a flash point, dominating the headlines and caused a wider conversation about codes not written on the cricket.

Tendulkar Backs Team India

Speaking through a video published in Reddit, Tendulkar put all its weight behind the India team and its approach to the situation. )Washington scored a hundred, and Jadja scored a hundred. Why is it not in the right spirit? They were playing a draw. Before that, they fought when England went and negotiated everything to beat brightly. “ He stated tenderly, praising the resilience of the Indian couple under pressure.

Tendulkar also criticized Stokes’s apparent irritation, emphasizing that it was England’s option to introduce part -time Harry Brook Towards the end, but not India’s obligation to help England support his main bowls before the next test. “It was not the problem of India. For me, they were fine. They were playing a draw, not for their hundreds. If they had left, India could have lost. When they went out in the bat, Harry Brook wasn’t bowling, right? He challenged, questioning the logic of the frustration of the English captain.

Also read: ENG VS IND – Fans call Dale Steyn after defending Ben Stokes on hand -handed man’s hand -handed

Tendulkar puts an end to the controversy

Although the incident added fuel to a burning series, it finally did not cling to the post-series atmosphere. After the fifth test ended with the leveled series, the players on both sides joined for an accustomed back, leaving aside the tensions of the field. Reports indicate that the teams exchanged camaraderie and respect, especially about the brave performances of the two banks throughout the summer.

Tendulkar, in conclusion, suggested that India’s decisions were dictated by party situations, not personal milestones or contempt for adversaries. “I am absolutely with the Indian team, either Gambhir or Shubman or Jadja or Washington, which decided. I’m 100 percent with them. In the last test game, when it was time to accelerate, Sundar did it brilliantly, right? Reiterated Sachin.

Also read: ENG VS IND – GAUTAM GAMBHIR questions England’s sportsma