Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
NewNow you can listen to Fox News articles!
Secretary Brand Rubio On Wednesday, reports were condemned, claiming that US strikes at Iran’s nuclear facilities did not cause such harm as Trump’s administration said.
Y en Interview with Politico At the NATO summit, Rubio has denied intelligence leaks, allegedly minimal damage from attacks and a media hit that distribute these leaks.
“I would say that history is a false story, and this is the one that should not be redirected because it does not reflect what is happening,” he told the White House Bureau of Politico Dasha Burns.
Secretary of State Mark Rubio discussed US stroke reports at Iranian nuclear facilities with Dasha Burns Politico on Wednesday. (Screenshot/politico)
The US military on Saturday spent large accurate strikes on three key nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz and ISFAHAN, trying to exclude a threat to the production of a country that produces nuclear weapons. B-2 bomber’s range abandoned Donald Trump It is called “spectacular military success”.
Burns caused Rubio’s response, asking about The New York Times and CNN, which report the leaks of the intelligence that made strikes not completely destroy Iran’s program, but may have only detained it for a few months. Other experts said the explosions probably caused considerable damage.
Report Times The statement published on Tuesday says: “The preliminary classified report in the US says that the American bombing of three nuclear sites in Iran has returned the country’s nuclear program for only a few months, according to officials familiar with the conclusions.”
HEGSET, military brass describes “incredible and preferred success” when we have strokes on Iran
On Saturday, June 21, 2025, the US military impressed three nuclear places in Iran. (Fox News)
“The strikes, sealed porches for two objects, but did not destroy their underground buildings, officials stated that the early conclusions had ended,” the report added.
Trump has denied this reportingCalling it a “false story” while talking to the NATO press press.
Rubio weighed, saying Burns that the leaks presented in the Times history do not necessarily reflect reality, but “often misused” and changed by whose rotation.
“I can also tell you that intelligence leaks are one of the most unpleasant things anywhere, not only because you have anyone who has access to it and take things there, but because it is so often wrong,” he said.
Click here to get additional media and culture lighting
“In the exploration report for those who have seen it, sometimes there is an assessment. Some analysts will make an assessment – or analysts will make an assessment – and in these leaks that you usually have one who reads it, and then trace into the media, giving it a rotation and angle they want to have,” he continued.
He added that someone could carry out information for various reasons, including “embarrass the administration” or because they were “against the action”.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Rubio then confirmed that from the US strikes in Iran, “the Iranian program – the nuclear program today – does not look like a week ago. The program today was behind where it was a week ago.”
