Read the most secret bots from the court that reached against the apple above their antiquettitive apps

The Judge Yvonne Gothalez Rogers is spicy in apple. Really, Really pissed off.

In Rogers “starting the first-first-page decision, took the apple and executives to challenate the court orders in his Original Case with Fortnite Maker Games Epic. I am Even Apple Bengeley Wonessa round, as it was monopolist, the court decided to shove in an antiqueometer fashion to make their customers in a

The judge drove that developers must be linked with other ways to make purchases, its app, so they could process payments via their payment site. In doing so, developers should be able to refresh the 30% Apple’s payment in the in-app application.

Apple, however, you did it no longer honors for each developers who chose this option. Just abandoned his commission to 27% for these external purchases and add “Screen”: Notice to Dissuade Customers who may be tempted to go to the road. With only one 3% of the original use of the original use of Apple, this method could end the cost developers even more when its own payment processing fees has been taken.

As an exit, apple has protected your free trade pattern to the expense, its relationship with the IOS developer IOS, and its niceness sting at the law of the law.

In roggers decision, it is clear that he had enough of Apple tactics, and the cane is closed tidbits justice where she explains

Apple has responded to the court of the court with the following statement: “We are strong with the decision. We will probable the order of the court and appelled.”

If you don’t have time to read all 80 pages, yourself, we rounded some of the best bits below. (Emphasis is ours).

The judge calls the apple to try route around their original orders

“Apple response for the belief of the gerbell. After two obvious objects, the apeviation, the Applecation, and has smacked their anticipular charm, Apple do not see through their obvious lid (the 2024 self-employed). ‘

The judge accuses the Apple to be even more antiques and lying in oath

“In contrasting in-court-crafty initial, Apple Witnesses it appears exactly what was and every time the truth, the truth, the financial the Alex Roman, straight lied under oath.‘

“Cook has chosen bad”: Judge Slams CEO Tim Cook to hear the CFO board

“The interior, a fillipped schiller that was Apple with the entry, but Tove suggested and instead of all teachers and his team financing to persuade otherwise. Cook has picked bad … the court refers to US assistance for the US District to investigate if the criminal proceedings are suitable. “

…

“As the signature is not recommended for a compellive, and Mr. Matesti is completely involved for the lucrative approach, Mr. Cook was the cut.”

(Any note that teachers is no longer at Apple, by the way?)

“This is a command, not a negotiation”: Judge says Apple is to respect now.

‘This is a shipping, not a negotiation. I am not doing-overs once a party is ignoring a court order. The time is of the essence. The court will not tolerate more delays. As previously ordered, apple does not prevent competition. The court enjoys apple to implement their new anti-install acts to avoid the ingion compliance. Effective immediately do not prevent developers’ ability to communicate with users or they will or impose a new commission on off-app purchases. “

The judge says the delayed apple proceedings to protect their profits

“Apple engaged in tactics to delay proceedings. The court after concluded that the delay of equal profits.”

“… Finally, epic and apples employed three masters to consult their Apple privileges. (See, DKT. The DKSMBLY’S USUDY, revealed that the delavitally worked their advantage.”

…

“The court is also found that the abuse of the customer’s Apple’s Apple to relax the proceedings and scores its decision process The sanction guarantees to desire the wrong future. I am Apple is sanctioned in the full cost of the attorne and epic actor’s chiefs on this issue at approximately 15 May 2025, the early date. The parties meet and confer about the current amount of. “

Apple Hid its decision from the court

“In its simpler” configuration has purchased the apple platermost, but also the chance of the developer’s, and the payment of the developer’s after a result of external purchase …. to an external website. ” … Apple Hid his / her decision process from the court only to have uncovered to the second obvious audition in 2025. “

…

“Apple coded their activities relating to the compliment to hire as ‘Project michigan‘… when the Nolu Circuit has issued his wierdness of December, 2021 (DKK. No. 841), Apples appearing to be able to be able. “

Apple knew that it is not fulfilling the income

“Displays the fact that the brawl has the evidence that Apple has investigate the landscape, you have known to develop, still not decided to dip on the way to these problems was hiding from court and not revealed until 2025 hear. ‘

The judge says that VP of Alex’s Financial Finestythe romanted in oath

“Mr. Roman’s witness, finance vice, has been replaced with the misdirection and straight lies. I am He also went to test that the apple was not watching comparables to estimate the costs of alternative solutions that would develop purchase for ease. ‘

…

“The Roman sign has not stopped there, however. He also included January, 2024, Apple had no idea of ​​blocking on Kinked-out purchases

Q. And I caught the apple decided to impose a 27 percent fees on the linked builds before January 16, 2024, correct?

A. The decision has been done that day.

Q is your witness that up to 16th January, 2024, apple had no idea what – which fee is imposed on the linked purchases?

A. that is correct. ‘

“Another lie in oath: Trials of commercials to the Contemporary reveal that instead of the Apple plan character, including the 30% match, that had been determined in 2023.

Neither, no one who its consultant, ran, now evident, is found. They have not sought to retire witness or to have the testimony (although Apple asked that the other witness). Thus, apple will go away to have adopted the bugs and misrepreses to this court. “

Apple has made their screens even scaring more scarier

“Apple implemented a notice message, called” Screen “screen,” to deter users of the third party options. ‘

…

“The screen on the right is called the ‘sheet’ ‘that is a complete screen resumes after use clicks on an external
link. Moving left to right, warning level to use increases. Again, Apple chose the most anticompetitive option, to say the full screen grip. “

…

“Upto, apple decided the most anticompetitive option, that also, also the developer weight rather than the applied name. All of the 2024”.

“Few developers signed for the bond right program (external purchase links).”

“As of 2024 audio, only 34 reflections between the total developers on the App Store in the first place. In the price of the adoption fees may not be known. Apple tried here to mislead.‘

The court thinks at Apple breached the letter and spirit of engulf

“There are a lot of problems with Apple argument. First, it is ludicon to wait for the contents of the parameter order was. Suggest a creature of comparison Apple violates the literal text. The third, contrary to the Apple position, the other circuits seek the spirit is a litigatum applies a literal literal an ingest, hide that the interpretation is running out of eggs. ‘

…

“In the apple behavior, Galification: Doesn’t behave the texting of the law enforcement law envision investment text

The court says requirements for link transactions were not justify

“Apple justifications for these requirements (set above) I believe in tearing. The more notifications without knitted, and underline they do not require developers who selling physical things to apply for a link of link before they implement link transactions. Apple imposes these restrictions only for Link-Outs that competes with IAP “.

The Court Hold Apple in contempt

“The driver of the apple violates the ingion. The non-billing or minimis. The lack of the appropriateness of their control program, and institute a new fact of anticiously intended to enjoy the depth Court cannot, in each universe, real or virtual, be seen as good faith product or a rational interpretation of court orders. The court hold apple in civil dishes. Sanctions and relief in respect to the non-complayity of Apple are set the an Afra. ‘

…

“Apple has chosen to will of not complying with the sentence of this court. He has done so with the Express the intention of creating new anticompetitive barriers that would be, for design and in effect, maintain a rated flow; A previously found income flow before being antiquetitive. That thought this courtyard you tolerate such insubordinary was a thick limestone. Always, the cupulation has made you worse. For this court, there is no second bite in the apple. ‘