Read the more signs of the Apple court court

The Judge Yvonne Gothalez Rogers is spicy in apple. Really, Really pissed off.

In Rogers “starting the first-first-page decision, took the apple and executives to challenate the court orders in his Original Case with Fortnite Maker Games Epic. I am Even Apple Bengeley Wonessa round, as it was monopolist, the court decided to shove in an antiqueometer fashion to make their customers in a

The judge drove that developers must be linked with other ways to make purchases, its app, so they could process payments via their payment site. In doing so, developers should be able to refresh the 30% Apple’s payment in the in-app application.

Apple, however, you did it no longer honors for each developers who chose this option. Just abandoned his commission to 27% for these external purchases and add “Screen”: Notice to Dissuade Customers who may be tempted to go to the road. With only one 3% of the original use of the original use of Apple, this method could end the cost developers even more when its own payment processing fees has been taken.

As an exit, apple has protected your free trade pattern to the expense, its relationship with the IOS developer IOS, and its niceness sting at the law of the law.

In roggers decision, it is clear that he had enough of Apple tactics, and the cane is closed tidbits justice where she explains

Apple has responded to the court of the court with the following statement: “We are strong with the decision. We will probable the order of the court and appelled.”

If you don’t have time to read all 80 pages, yourself, we rounded some of the best bits below.

The judge calls the apple to try route around their original orders

“Apple response for the belief of the gerbell. After two obvious objects, the apeviation, the Applecation, and has smacked their anticipular charm, Apple not see through its obvious lid (the 2024 evidence of the obvious audience). ‘

The judge accuses the Apple to be even more antiques and lying in oath

“In service layer to the initial initial testimunion, the apple pigeons you know exactly what was and each time the truth Romanes, inside.”

“Cook has chosen bad”: Judge Slams CEO Tim Cook to hear the CFO board

“Aranal

…

“As the signature is not recommended for a compellive, and Mr. Matesti is completely involved for the lucrative approach, Mr. Cook was the cut.”

(Any note that teachers is no longer at Apple, by the way?)

“This is a command, not a negotiation”: Judge says Apple is to respect now.

“This is a shipping, not a negotiation. They are not doing the court order. The time does not tolerate the action. The court has ordered the attachment of the inging or imposing a new commission on off-app purchase.”

The judge says the delayed apple proceedings to protect their profits

“Apple engaged in tactics to delay proceedings. The court after concluded that the delay of equal profits.”

“Finally, Epic and Apple engaged three specials to consult their privilege of their privilege. (See, DKT. The DKTNAGE OF THE APPLICATION OF APPLICATION, revealed that the advantage worked their advantage.”

…

“The court also finds the abuse of the actualization of the currently procile to the decision decision process due”

Apple Hid its decision from the court

“In their simplest” configuration has purchased the apple’s platform in a developer website and payment of the developer in a developer after a external purchase (to an external purchase. “To an external website.” … Apple hiding his / her decision proceedings from the court just to have uncovered to the second self-employed in 2025. “

…

“Apple coded their activities related to the” Michigan Draft “when the most circuit the Upper the 821 (DKT), appeared appeared for conforming efforts.”

Apple knew that it is not fulfilling the income

“Despite Corsa has the evidence that Apple investigate the landscape, you have known to develop the scallamize a commuption of these problems and not revealed until 2025 feeling.”

The judge says that VP of Alex’s Financial Finestythe romanted in oath

“Tominate Mr. Roman, Vice president, he left with misdirections and has also been to sticky tests that costs have not seen that purchase to facilitate facility.”

…

“The Roman sign has not stopped there, however. He also included January, 2024, Apple had no idea of ​​blocking on Kinked-out purchases

Q. And I caught the apple decided to impose a 27 percent fees on the linked builds before January 16, 2024, correct?

A. The decision has been done that day.

Q is your witness that up to 16th January, 2024, Apple had no idea what the fee has to impose on the linked purchases?

A. that is correct. ‘

“Another lie in oath: Trials of commercials to the Contemporary reveal that instead of the Apple plan character, including the 30% match, that had been determined in 2023.

Neither, no one who its consultant, ran, now evident, is found. They have not sought to retire witness or to have the testimony (although Apple asked that the other witness). Thus, apple will go away to have adopted the bugs and misrepreses to this court. “

Apple has made their screens even scaring more scarier

“Apple implemented a notice message, called” Screen “screen,” to deter users of the third party options. ‘

…

“The screen on the right is called the ‘sheet’ ‘that is a complete screen resumes after use clicks on an external
link. Moving left to right, warning level to use increases. Again, Apple chose the most anticompetitive option, to say the full screen grip. “

…

“Upto, apple decided the most anticompetitive option, that also, also the developer weight rather than the applied name. All of the 2024”.

“Few developers signed for the bond right program (external purchase links).”

“As of 2024 audio, only 34 reflections between the total developers on the App Store in the first place. In the price of the adoption fees may not be known. Apple has tried here to make you mistake. “

The court thinks at Apple breached the letter and spirit of engulf

“There are a lot of problems with Apple argument. First, it is literal of the literal. The literal of the literal is applied for an advoltable literal interpretion

…

“In the apple behavior, Galification: Doesn’t behave the texting of the law enforcement law envision investment text

The court says requirements for link transactions were not justify

“Apple’s justifications for these requirements (establish the belief of the stratel. Most of the sticky joints. Apple deploying these restraint only for IAP.”

The Court Hold Apple in contempt

“Apple’s conduct violates ingion. The non-billing or minimis. The court. The court. The court. Soltions and relief of compliance is established the Afra.”

…

“Apple has chosen not to comply with this Express Court of Extrecilitional business that was thinking of the antiquetthetic. As always, there is not a second bite.”