Rajasthan Royals dragged on the Supreme Court in the case of Sreat in the middle of Slapgate controversy

It Rajasthan Royals Have been found in another controversy as its long -term legal battle involved in the old Indian Pealer Sreesanth came to the Supreme Court. The Rajasthan Royals and the United India Insurance Company are struggling for the Drama of the 2012 IPL season.

The problem began when Rajasthan Royals filed an insurance claim of more than 82 ₹ Lakh after Sreesanth was ruled out in the 2012 season. The fast diaper had suffered a knee injury during a practice game, which forced him to lose all IPL 2012 season.

The Supreme Court listens

The Royals argued that they were eligible for compensation as the injury occurred during the insurance period, but the United Indian insurance company refused. They rejected the claim, insisting that Sreet had a 2011 feet injury that he did not reveal.

Your daily dose of cricket!

prior

next

The insurance company stated that the greatest injury could have prevented Sreesanth from playing inside IPL 2012, so Rajasthan Royals’s demand was invalid. But the franchise insisted that the foot injury was not serious and had not prevented Sreat from playing earlier.

They emphasized that this was the knee injury, and not anything else, which had completely ruled it out of that season. Even the National Commission of Consumer Dispute Disputes (NCDRC) had previously ordered the Insurance Company to pay the amount requested by the Rajasthan Royals.

Also read: Gautam Gambhir has an impactful kohli shot and names Shubman Gill the “most elegant” cricket

The Supreme Court requested more documents in the final sight

But the company decided to climb the matter and brought the matter to the Supreme Court. Now, at the recent audience, a bank of justice Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta focused on whether the old Sreesanth finger injury had been revealed at the time of taking the franchise coverage.

The judges also wondered if the insurance company already knew the injury; If so, it should not have accepted the policy and must first be agreed to Sreat.

The Supreme Court has now postponed the case, asking the insurance company to send more documents, including the Sreesanth Fitness Certificate and the original insurance application, to check if the injury was disseminated before delivering its final verdict.

Insurance Company claims that Rajasthan Royals hid the past injury of Sreat

During the hearing, the United Indian insurance company was represented by administrator Aishwarya Bhati. The company stated that the main problem was that RR did not reveal the injury to Pacer’s feet.

They said that politics was assumed that all past injuries were completely revealed, but they were not, so the claim could not be accepted.

RR argues that the Sreesanth knee injury cost the IPL 2012, not the old feet problem

On the other hand, Senior Senior Lawyer Kishan Kaul presented the Royals on the court. He argued that the feet injury had nothing to do with Sreesanth’s ability to play, as the diaper had already participated in matches after recovering. It was the sudden knee injury that Sreeesanth collected during the insured period that ruled him out of the tournament.

The position of the Royals is that their main purpose of taking this policy is to safeguard both the franchise and the players. If a cricketter is injured during the season and cannot play, politics should ensure that player payments and team expenses are covered, regardless of old issues that had no effect on their physical fitness at the time.

Kaul also said that when Sreesanth joined the franchise, the insurance company received a fitness certificate and another certificate was submitted later when he suffered a knee injury.

Also read: Robin Uthappa blames the “honesty” by the bitter fall with kohli shot

Source link