Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Reporter Technology
Video -video generator Elon Musk was charged with “intentionally choosing” to create a sexually obvious Taylor Swift clips without prompting, the Internet abuse expert says.
“This is not a misery by accident, it is design,” said Claire McGulin, a professor of law who helped develop a law that will make pornographic deep braids illegal.
According to Report by borderThe new “sharp” regime “Grok to imagine, was not shy to spit out completely unauthorized in topless -Video Pop -Star, without asking for obvious content.
The report also states that the correct age check methods – which became the law in July – were not in place.
XAI, a company standing for Grok, appealed to the comments.
Xai own Acceptable Use Policy prohibits “reflect the similarity of people pornographically”.
“The fact that this content is made without prompting demonstrates the misery bias of many AI technologies,” said Professor McGulin of Darem University.
“Platforms such as X could interfere with this if they chose, but they made a deliberate choice,” she added.
This is not the first time the image of Taylor Swift is used in this way.
Sexually obvious depths using her face became viral and viewed Millions of times On X and Telegram in January 2024.
Deepfakes-it’s computer images that replace one person’s face with another.
Having tried the fencing of Groko, imagine the writer News News Jess Weterbid entered the hint: “Taylor Swift celebrated Coachella with the boys.”
Grok created fixed images of a fast that wears a dress with a group of men.
Then it can be lively in short videos in four different settings: “normal”, “fun”, “user” or “sharp”.
“She immediately ripped off (the dress), had nothing but a subscribing under it, and began to dance, completely without censorship, completely exhibited,” said MS Weatherbed BBC News.
She added: “It was shockingly how quickly I was met – I never asked her to remove her clothes, all I did was choose a” sharp “option.
Gizmodo reports Similarly obvious results of famous women, although some searches also returned blurred videos or with a “moderated video”.
BBC could not independently check AI CCTV results.
Ms Weatherbed said she signed up for a paid version of Grok Imagine, which cost 30 pounds using a brand new Apple account.
Grok asked for a date of birth, but there was no other age check, she said.
Under New UK laws The power that came into force at the end of July, the platforms that show obvious images should check the ages of the users, using methods that “technically accurate, reliable, reliable and fair.”
“Sites and applications that include AI generative tools that can create pornographic materials are regulated in accordance with the law,” said the Media Regulator of BBC News.
“We know about increasing and rapidly developing Genai risk tools, especially for children, and we are working to have the platforms to place appropriate guarantees for mitigating these risks,” the report said.
Currently, the generation of pornographic deep groups is illegal when using porn revenge or reflecting children.
Professor McGulin has helped develop a amendment to the law that would make or request all the unlawful pornographic deep farms illegal.
The government has pledged to make the amendments, but it will come into force.
“Every woman should have the right to choose who possesses her intimate images,” said Baroness Owen, who suggested amendment In the house of Lords.
“It is necessary that these models are not used in such a way that violates the woman’s right to consent whether she is celebrity or not,” Lady Owen continued in a BBC News statement.
“This case is a clear example of why the government should not postpone the correction in the Lord,” she added.
The press secretary of the Ministry of Justice said: “Sexual obvious depths created without consent are humiliated and harmful.
“We refuse to carry violence against women and girls who stain our society, and therefore we have adopted the legislation to prohibit their creation as soon as possible.”
When pornographic deep features using Taylor Swift’s face in 2024 became viral, X temporarily blocked the search for her name on the platform.
At the time, X stated that it “actively removes” images and accepting “appropriate actions” against the accounts involved in their distribution.
Ms Weterabed said the team on The Verge chose Taylor Swift to check the Grok Imagine feature from this incident.
“We thought – mistaken – that if they put any guarantees to prevent their imitation of the celebrities, that it would be the first on the list, given the problems they had,” she said.
Taylor Swift’s representatives appealed to the comments.