One of Charlie Kirk’s latest messages was a gift that the party would take it

A few hours before the assassination, Charlie KirkLast batch of messages on Facebook included criticism Article Wall Street Journal As for the growing national consequences Significant Law on Kentuck’s Children’s CareHaving a precipitation, which involves an equal time of upbringing, is of interest to the child.

The WSJ article states that the level of divorce falls in the Bluegrade from the historical law and how four other states have passed similar laws. However, there is another convincing reason for both sides to push for the general upbringing of children: voters want it, and evidence indicates that it affects how they vote. And the more vocal political candidates to support the equal care for parenting, the more votes they will receive.

NY Times defended the belief that Charlie Kirk practiced the “right way” after the liberal reaction

Once the general law on raising Kentucky’s children went up, the elections soon showed Direct correlation Between the percentage of the challenged races and the support of the bill. From the challenged home races, 100% of the sponsors won, 90% of those who voted “yes”, 80% of those who did not vote, won, and none of those who voted “no”. In fact, every sponsor beat, who ran again, won, despite 14 places that change the parties.

Republicans and Democrats should not be surprised by this, as voters are constantly saying to them that they support the general upbringing of children. It’s not just Kentucky. The National Organization of Parents has ordered an independent poll In 29 states and joint upbringing has great support in each state, red and blue. Not only the majority of Republicans and Democrats support the legislation, but also most demographic ones. It doesn’t matter whether women, men, African Americans or Latinos are interviewed. All of them demonstrate the support of most for the overall upbringing of children.

The message of Kirk, which supports equal care laws, subtly directed the parties to promote the overall upbringing of children, as it makes voters more likely to vote for what the party provides a candidate for parents. Any party, which recruits several additional voters in a swing such as North Carolina, can fade in the elections. In addition, the voters of Tar -Chell tell the parties loudly and clearly how to get more votes: to undergo overall upbringing of children. Amazing 94% said “more likely they vote for a candidate who supports children who spend equal or almost equal time with each parent … when both parents fit and are ready to be parents.” Voters in decisive Pennsylvania tell the parties the same thing by 91%. In Wisconsin, the state of the turning point in the 2016 presidential election, it is even higher, by 96%. In each Swing poll, candidates can receive a similar incentive with 94% of Georgia and 95% of the New Hampshire support support.

Key Cases of Parents’ Parents Scotus Draw McMuhon, Mommy for Freedom to rally along the steps

It is strange that no party made a big pressure on this topic. First, the general upbringing of children seems obvious to Democrats. The Democrat national brand is considering equality problems, and what is more equal than the equal time for children for both parents? Democrats can promote the general upbringing of children, and this will be reserved with their base, which requires legal justice to all groups. African Americans and LGBTC -individuals have great distrust of the legal system, and many do not believe that they can get a fair hearing of children when another parent is white and/or direct. In addition, the Liberal Party spent money, studying how to make an entry with men. Well, only 13% of Kentuktsy stated that family courts are likely to not give men less custody of children.

Talking about men, should they not be on the side of the Republican Gender Break? So, why is this not the obvious GOP problem? Their basic force – with people, a group that not only supports the general upbringing of children, but also believes that they are not given a fair treatment. In addition, Republicans want to hit the minorities. Men and women of minority support the equal upbringing of children, and this certainly includes a crucial Spanish vote.

In a closely divided nation, voters tell the parties the same thing that Charlie Kirk did: support the family law on equality. Democrats or Republicans can gain an advantage in Swing and deploy blocks for voting, taking the question that both of their bases want. Or maybe I have to say that their current bases are because this powerful question gives any participant shot when eating in the base of others.