Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The old Williams Scott Filing court documents reveals his massive monthly income and substantial net value as part of his court struggle with his ex-wife, Olivia Korenberg. Weekly US can report only.
The American pie Star, 48, made a statement of income and cost in court detailing his financial situation, on Monday, August 18.
Scott listed himself as an actor who started working in the field in 2000. He said he won $ 54,699 last month, but on average, he takes about $ 110,000 a month home salary or salary. It earns an average of $ 45,000 a month on royalty payments and $ 31,000 on interests/interest payments.
It has $ 158,000 in cash and check/saving accounts, $ 12,285,322 in stocks and bonds and another $ 18,781,328 in real property, including three homes in Los Angeles, Mini Cooper worth $ 30,000, Honda Passport worth $ 55,000, jewelry and furniture. Scott also owns artwork worth $ 93,000.
Its monthly costs include $ 15,000 in property taxes, $ 5,000 in repairs, $ 2,500 on foods, $ 1,500 on eating out, $ 2,000 on utilities, $ 500 on its mobile phone, $ 1,500 on clothing, $ 1,500 on entertainment and $ 11,000 on various other Bills for Grand Bills for $ 59, per $ 59, per $ 59, per $ 59 59, spent on a total of $ 59, for $ 59,
The old Williams Scott
Niki Nikolova/FilmmagicIn the divorce, he paid nearly $ 500,000 to his legal team. Scott said he believed his former recovery had won about $ 5,500 a month as an interior designer.
As Us He first reported, on July 28, the judge who presided over the divorce of Scott and Korenberg was siding with the actor.
Seann William Scott; Olivia Korenberg
Albert L. Ortega/wirimage; Stefanie Keenan/Getty Images for LaxartScott filed for a divorce from Korenberg, 35, in 2024 after four years of marriage. They reached a joint custody deal a few months later.
In April, Korenberg filed new documents claiming Scott Tried to “turn out” from one of his homes. He pleaded with the court to postpone the date Scott wanted out of home. He also insisted the only custody and for permission to move further than 20 miles away from Scott, which the custody deal needed.
Korenberg claimed Scott bought a $ 3.3 million home in 2023 for her and their daughter to live in. She said he approved renewals and made her appear that he could wait longer than the agreed year. Korenberg claims he asked her to move out of home weeks after she told him a new romantic partner.
Olivia Korenberg, Charlie Pohald and Marika Kielland
Stefanie Keenan/Getty images for LaxartScott denied the allegations. He said he never promised Korenberg that he could live at home in the long run. He said his decision to sell was not vindictive, and that he supported her new relationship. He said the decision had been made after a conversation with his financial advisers.
They both testified in court during a multi-day case. Court eventually denies Korenberg’s attempt to win the only custody.
The parties are currently fighting for attorney fees in the case.
In her filing, Korenberg said she believed Scott had won over $ 200,000 a month. She claimed that she had made just about $ 350 a month in income from her interior design company. Won another $ 2,750 in interest.
Korenberg listed $ 23,000 in the bank and $ 1 million in stock or bonds. She said her monthly expenses totaled $ 15,685, of which Scott paid $ 6,000.
In the documents, it was revealed that Scott had tried to settle the matter before the case went to trial. He offered to buy a home for Korenberg to live near his home in Venice, California. His lawyer said that Korenberg “simply not interested.”
“Instead, what should have been solved in a simple manner by Olivia into a troubled suffering, made increasingly turbulent by Olivia repeatedly changed her mind over and over and over again about her favorite destination, which led to significant fees being unreasonably stated,” claimed Scott’s lawyer. Scott also agreed to increase child maintenance. She asked for a refusal of her application for $ 284,000 in legal fees.
Korenberg’s lawyer argued that the fees were justified, and her client, though not overwhelmed, was looking out for their daughter’s best benefit.
A judge has not yet controlled.