Mitchell Starc vs Jasprit Bumrah after 47 tests: Who is high among the legends of the modern rhythm?

Mitchell Starc and Jasprit bumrah They are two of the most prominent quick bowls of the modern test cricket, known for their contrasting styles and impactful performances.

The Fanatics War erupts about supremacy between Jasprit Bumrah and Mitchell Starc

In the increasing debate of Bumrah vs Starc, especially after Bumrah performed 47 tests, a statistical comparison and impacts illuminated social networks, especially on the X platform, causing fan wars among Cricket supporters. While Starc is the experienced horse with more than 100 tests and more than 400 doctors, the brilliance of Bumrah in fewer parties, the outside dominance and surgical accuracy have turned it into a convincing battle. The true debate is not only about the volume, but on where and how doctors arrived. One has longevity. While others have lethality.

It is not a debate because it depends on what you prioritize.

Bumrah is a more dominant bowl than Starc? Without a doubt. But Starc’s legacy is largely within its longevity.

It has been doing this for the best part of a decade, the summer after the summer. This is special. https://t.co/hly4s6fqgb

– Neal Gardner (@nealbackup) July 15, 2025

Notice how Starc is the goat to act against a tide, Name, surf windies windmas as we have to show the greatness of Bumrah, continuously showing its statistics in important tournaments, tests from outside and it is still called to have 20 doctors in some entrances

– Udit (@Udit_Buch) July 16, 2025

The story will evaluate Mitchell Starc Superior than Jasprit Bumrah, only due to the ability of the first to manage the workload and pure coherence.

– TUSHAR Gupta (@tushar15_) July 15, 2025

You will never understand the compulsive need for clowns to drag Jasprit Bumrah in a debate every time Mitchell Starc works well. Just thank Aussie’s great spell.

For me, Bumrah will always remain miles ahead. He is the largest ballist this generation will ever see.

– Anuj Nitin Prabhu (@Aptalkscriclet) July 15, 2025

Starc, a Pheman on the left arm of AustraliaIt is celebrated by its express rhythm, the deliveries swinging and the ability to generate fierce yorkers. He has been a wide caregiver consistent for Australia during a long career, often making progress with his aggressive approach.

On the other hand, Bumrah, a quick bowl of the right arm of India, is known for its unique action, its incredible precision, the subtle seam movement and the devastating yorkers. It has quickly settled as a world class bowl in all formats, especially excellent in the test cricket with its ability to extract rebound and movement of any surface. While Starc brings a dirty rhythm and an attacking mentality, Bumrah is based on precision, control and move in trouble problems, making the two formidable opponents themselves.

Mitchell Starc or Jasprit Bumrah: The Great Pealer of Test Cricket

1. Performance in Australia: Bumrah domain to Down Under vs Starc’s Home Force

Mitchell Starc has played 55 of his 100 tests at home Australia and achieved a success with 235 doctors at an average of 26.46, helped by family conditions. However, the entire stretch of 12 Jasprit Bumrah tests in Australia has been in foreign land. Despite this, Bumrah has collected 64 doctors with a sensational average of 17.15, winning 2 men’s men and 1 man in the series, all away from home. This comparison only puts perspective as Bumrah thrives in tougher circumstances. For one, it is her patio; For the other, it is a battlefield and yet Bumrah has had more impact.

2. Quality of doctors

One of the most important differences between the two pacers lies in the type of doctors who take. The 15 Bumrah Wicker Tours include only 28.75% of Tailender victims (No. 8–11), highlighting their blow to eliminate the highest batters, the most valuable dismissals in the test cricket. Starc, on the other hand, has 16 five-Fors, but a significant 32.55% of these layoffs have been against the lower order. This not only indicates that Bumrah spells are more destructive in advance, but also shows their ability to break collaborations and turn parties to their side.

Also read: Few balls to make a 5 wicket transport to the FT cricket test. Mitchell Starc

3. Efficiency and strike rate (after 47 tests)

Efficiency in the test cricket is not only about the number of doctors, but also the speed and constant and constant that a ballotter gives them. After 47 tests, Bumrah launched 9,150 deliveries for 217 doctors, while Starc needed 9,845 balls to take 196 doctors. This is an important indicator, Bumrah grabs fewer balls to get more doctors. Its average (19.60) and the economy (2.78) also surpass the Starc (average of 27+, economics 3.41) from the same point in their career. Bumrah’s relentless accuracy and accuracy make it a bowler that can depend, anywhere and against anyone.

4. Bowling averages with a country

Jasprit Bumrah has never played a test game Pakistan or to the UaeSo you don’t have statistics there. Starc has, and its average in these regions is 42, another indicator that the conditions of the subcontinent test their skills. Bumrah, on the other hand, has played through the Sinea countries (South Africa, England, New Zealand, Australia) and has dominated each. Its average in India (17.19) and South -Africa (20.76) emphasizes its ability to extract results on very different lands. Starc, despite his experience, has fought in India (average 53.66), New Zealand (43.20) and Pakistan/Emirates United (42). This disparity reveals more than numbers: demonstrates adaptability.

• Note: Bumrah has not played tests Pakistan or Uae.

5. Match Awards in the test cricket

In terms of matches recognition, Bumrah is on the shoulder with Starc despite playing less than half of the number of tests. Bumrah has 3 Man of the Match Awards and 3 Man of the Series, all the Mos Awards coming out of the house, reflecting how their performances change the results of the series. Starc, after 100 tests, has 4 mother and 2 bite, both of which are moving away, but often without the type of domain in the form of a consistent party that Bumrah offers.

The story from head to head reveals a lot: Bumrah vs Australia has been a tale of domain: 64 doctors in 12 tests at 17.15. In the meantime, Starc Against India, in 23 tests, he has taken 66 doctors, but with an average swollen 35.84. When it comes to larger bilateral competitions, Bumrah has been shown more effective and dangerous. It thrives under pressure; Starc fluctuates.

Final Verdict: Who is better after 47 tests between Bumrah and Starc?

Starc has been a consistent servant of the burning, aggressive and often explosive Australian cricket. But at the mark of 47 tests, Bumrah is not only so statistically higher but also situation of situation more shocking. He does more with less, fewer games, fewer balls, even more doctors, better averages, more strict economics and farther wins. Its adaptability to all continents, the ability to dismantle the most important orders and the dominion against the sides of elite lifts it to a modern -day league.

Also read: ENG VS IND: IRFAN PATHAN questions Jasprit Bumrah’s workload strategy after loss loss