Liberal Justice claims that Tennessee transgendary law deals with “irreversible damage” in dissent

NewNow you can listen to Fox News articles!

Justice Sonia Sotomer blew up six of his colleagues by Supreme On Wednesday, in a brilliant dissent for the decision to support the Tennessee Act, which prohibits specific transgender medical procedures for minors.

Sotamoior said the decision of 6-3 in the US against Skrymeti, issued on ideological lines, is incorrectly discriminated against minors based on their gender. Liberal justice made an atypical step to read her disagreement out of the bench.

The sotomator, who was appointed court, former President Barack Obama, said that the majority “refuses to call the shovel” and “obscure sex classification” to allow Tennessee’s bill to withstand constitutional tests.

The Supreme Court seems to

(LR) Chief Judge of the United States Supreme Court John Roberts and US Supreme Court Judiciary Sonia Sonia Look at the US President Joe Biden's address in the US House of Capitol's House in Washington, Columbia, 7 March 2024 (photo by Mandel Ngan / AFP)

Supreme Court Chief Judge John Roberts and Supreme Court Associate Professor Sonia Sotamior look at the then President Joe Biden in the US House in Washington, Colombia, March 7, 2024. (Photo by Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)

‘Court’s readiness to do this here causes irreversible damage The point of equal protection And he invites the legislative bodies to participate in discrimination, hiding brazen sexual classifications in mind, “said Sotamoior.

The right that was one of the closest terms of the Supreme Court arose from Biden Administration To sue the Tennessee’s bill, which took place in 2023 to ban puberty and hormone therapy as treatments for minors related to transgenders.

SCOTUS Rules on State Prohibition of Gender Procedure for Minors in a Significant Case

The appearance of the Supreme Court in the daytime

The Supreme Court sees on the Capitoli hill in Washington, the District of Columbia (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

Sotomoor, whose disagreement was joined by Justiks Ketandi Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan, said doctors offer such medical treatments based on a patient who has gender dysforium. A law that prohibits that practice requires a strong level of attention, which the majority does not apply, that most of the Supreme Court is not applied.

Protector

Demonstrators are protesting in support of transgender youth rights. (Fox News)

Click here to get the Fox News app

“Most are subjected to a law that clearly discriminates on the basis of sex to a simple rational review,” the Sotamoior wrote. “By receding from a significant trial, where it is most important, the court refuses transgender children and their families to political whims. I disagree in sadness.”

The Supreme Court’s decision effectively allows states that make laws like Tennisprohibits some medical treatment for minors.

Source link