Lack of case announced in the case of Weinstein for charge of rape

A Judge in New York has announced a lawsuit on charges of rape of sexual offenses Harvey Weinstein after one jury refused to continue reflections on allegedly attacking Actress Jessica Mann.

The jury found Weinstein guilty of one of the articles of a sexual attack, not guilty of the second charge on Wednesday, but continued to talk about the final charge of rape.

Last year, the issue of the trial was held on Thursday after the Vayinstein’s criminal conviction was abolished last year, which led to new charges in September last year.

Six days at six weeks of trial, before one juror refused to continue the discussion, a group of seven women and five men for six weeks.

The restrictions of the jury in the trial were suffered from tensions. Earlier this week, the jury brought concern for the judge, saying that the jury was “attacking” each other and trying to change their mind.

On Wednesday, he addressed the judge more complaints, showing that “at least another juror spoke about the effect” I will meet you in one day “and shout and shout there,” Judge Kurtis Farber said in court.

On Thursday, Foreperson stated that he would not return to the juror’s room, so that he would be afraid of others, so the judge announced a court decision on the last charge of rape.

“Sometimes the jury’s discussion is heated. I understand that this discussion was more necessary than some others,” said Judge Farbers of the jury, the US media reports.

In his statement, the press secretary of Weinstein said his team believed that the conviction would be “delayed” from the “rough violation of the rules of the jury”.

“8 years, dozens of accusers, three trials, one conviction,” said Judas Engemeer’s press. “Harvey is disappointed with a single sentence but does not lose faith and heart to continue to fight to clear his name.”

The Court of Appeal canceled the preliminary conviction of Weinstein for his sex crimes in New York last April, finding that the 73-year-old guy did not receive a fair trial in 2020, as the judge allowed the women who made charges against him.

The 2025 court was based on the testimony of three women – former Television production assistant Miriam Haley, actress Jessica Mann and Polish model Kaj Sokol. All three accused Weinstein of using their strength in the entertainment industry to sexually abuse them. Ms Haley and Ms. Mann testified in the first trial against Weinstein when he was found guilty.

This time, the jurors found Weinstein guilty of a sexual assault on Mrs. Haley, but justified him in the attack on Mrs. Sokol. A report on rape charged, given by Ms. Man.

The last conviction is in addition to a 16-year sentence that Weinstein has not yet been executed after being convicted of sex crimes in Los Angeles.

Last week, the juror’s reflections were tense when one jury stated that the other “avoided” one member of the board, calling it a “playground”.

Foreperson also claimed that the jury was considering the past Weinstein and other accusations on the border of the case when making decisions.

This forced the judge to give a juror instruction only to consider the allegations in the case and nothing else.

Weinstein – who was held during the lawsuit at the Belva hospital, not in an island prison. He was sitting in a wheelchair.

In general, Weinstein is accused of violating sexual actions, attacks and rapes of more than 100 women. Although not all messages have led to a criminal case, a criminal conviction in California means that he is probably spending the rest of his life in prison.

Weinstein and his brother Bob were one of the most basic figures in Hollywood, the founder of the Miramax film studio, whose hits included Shakespeare in love, which won the best picture on Academy Awards and Pulp Fiction.

Source link