Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Three women and two doctors sue for blocking Kansas’s law This is an invalid medical directive of a pregnant woman to treat the end of her life.
Plaintiffs – one of whom is currently pregnant – challenge the constitutionality of the point in the law on the natural death of the state, which denies pregnant women to make pre -directives accept or abandon health care if they become incapacitated or deadly.
Patient plaintiffs Emma Vernon, Abigale Otovere and Laura Strattan and the Michael Michel Bennet filed a lawsuit Thursday. He claims that in this point violates the right to personal autonomy, privacy, the same attitude and freedom of speech, ignoring the decisions of pregnant women at the end of life.
CDC removes vaccine recommendation for healthy children pregnant mothers
Two doctors and three women sue the Kansas Law, which is invalid medical decisions that pregnant women can take on the treatment of the end of life. (Istock)
Vernon, a pregnant plaintiff, wrote a pre -directive healthcare directive, which states that when a pregnant and diagnosed terminal state, she would like to obtain a treatment that supports life, “there is reasonable medical confidence” that her child will reach a full term and be born “with a considerable perspective.
The lawsuit states that her directive was not “considering the same respect that the law provides others who complying the directives from the exclusion of pregnancy, and therefore it does not enjoy the same level of confidence as otherwise the directive.”
In all states there are laws that allow people to write in advance medical care directives they would like to get if they are unable to make their own health decisions. Nine States, including in Kansas, have a recognition provisions a pregnant woman Previous directive.
The plaintiffs claim that the law violates the right to personal autonomy, privacy, the same attitude and freedom of speech. (Istock)
Doctors who joined the trial said the law requires their pregnant patients Low medical care What other patients open them to civil and criminal lawsuits, as well as to professional punishments.
The lawsuit states that the doctors “deeply committed to the basic medical principles, that patients have a fundamental right to determine what treatment they receive, and that it provides treatment without informed consent of the patient, violates both medical ethics and the law.”
New Mom Against Husband for Choosing Friends and Barbecue Over Her and their Newborn
The defendants in the trial are Prosecutor General Kansas Chris Kobach (pictured), President of the Kansas Richard Bradbury Art Council and District District District Dakota Lumis. (AP Photo/John Hanna)
Click here to get the Fox News app
“However, the Kansas law makes them ignore clearly expressed decisions of their patients, forcing them to provide pregnant patients with lower medical care than any of other patients receiving,” continues. “This requires this reduction in the care, without suggesting the clarity of what treatment they should provide at the end of life,” saying what the law expects by exposing them to civil, criminal and professional consequences in order to make a mistake. “
The defendants in the lawsuit are Prosecutor General Kansas Chris Kobach, President of the Kansas Richard Bradbury Council and District Dakot Dakota Lumis district prosecutor.
