Justin Baldoni will not review claims against Blake Lively in the middle of a legal case

Justin Baldoni have chosen not to re -draw claims counteracting it against Blake lively and Ryan Reynolds.

The news comes weeks after the judge Lewis J. Liman dismiss Legitimate case $ 400 million Baldoni against Lively, 37, and Reynolds, 48. Anti -beth Baldoni came after his lively charging It ends with us Costar and Director, 41, of sexual harassment, creating a hostile work environment and creating a cervical campaign against her following their work on the 2024 film.

The judge at the time noted that Baldoni could continue to change his allegations for an implicit covenant and contractual intervention in relation to a vibrant but he had to do so by Monday, June 23.

Baldoni’s attorney Bryan Freedman reveal to People It is on Tuesday, June 24, that the actor and director will give up the option to bring forward any improvements. Instead, Baldoni will focus on his trial and lively to come around her lawsuit December 2024 against him for his alleged misconduct.

Justin Baldoni promises to continue to fight Blake's lively legal after dismissing case


Related: Justin Baldoni promises to continue to fight Blake’s lively legal after dismissing

Justin Baldoni does not abandon his legal battle as Costar Blake lives lively after her legal proceedings against her and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, were dismissed. “Ms. Lively and her team’s victory statement is fake, so let’s be clear about the latest ruling,” Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, told us (…)

“The court’s decision on the sacking proposal has no effect on the truth that there was no harassment or cervical campaign, and in no way does not affect our vigorous defense against Ms. Lively’s claims,” ​​Freedman said in a statement.

The attorney continued: “Discovery is ongoing and we are confident that we will override these non -Factual accusations. Instead of reviewing the current allegations, our clients will follow additional legal options available to us.”

A spokesman for a lively behalf responded to a legal update, saying Weekly US In a statement on Tuesday, “The court rejected the frivolous legal case $ 400 million Baldoni-Wayfarer as a whole. In the days that followed, Baldoni’s lawyer said the judge’s decision to reject their case was not a big deal as they did promising and conflict in the whole.

Justin Baldoni does not review claims against Blake Lively 3
Nicole Rivelli/Sony Photos Release/Everett Collection

In addition a source is reported close to the matter Us.

Months left It ends with us Hit theaters in August 2024, Lively, who was also a producer on the film, Baldoni accused of sexual harassmentCreate a hostile work environment and organize an alleged cervical campaign against it in a legal case filed that December.

Baldoni denied all the allegations against him and filed resistance the same month he accused lively, Reynolds and publisher Leslie Sloane of extortion, defamation and more. (Lively and Reynolds denied the allegations as Sloane did.)

Justin Baldonis team claims Blake Lively pushed Taylor Swift to delete their text messages


Related: Blake Lively asks for Taylor Swift ‘sasteless’ claims from a legal record

Update 5/14/25 at 6:57 pm – Blake Lively’s legal team filed a new offer to ask Justin Baldoni’s allegations for his friend Taylor Swift to be broken from the record, us Weekly can confirm. In the letter received from us, Lively’s team noted that Baldoni’s letter was filed without “evidence support of any kind.” “It should (…)

Baldoni also filed a $ 250 million libel legal case against The New York Times for his attention from a lively initial complaint against him.

Judge liman Reject Baldoni’s legal case Against a lively, Reynolds and Sloane on June 9. The case also refused against The New York Times.

Justin Baldoni does not review claims against Blake Lively
Nicole Rivelli/Sony Photos Release/Everett Collection

“Ms Lively and her team’s predictable statement of Victory is fakeSo let’s be clear about the latest judgment, ”Baldoni Freedman attorney have said Us In a statement on June 10. “While the court has rejected the defamation related claims, the court has invited us to amend four out of the seven allegations against Ms. Lively, which will display additional evidence and refine allegations. This case relates to false accusations of sexual harassment and revenge and revenge and revenge that never exist, which are not described as Ms.”

He claimed, “Most importantly, Ms. Lively’s own claims are no more true today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence we had when Ms Lively started and her squads of this battle and look forward to her upcoming deposition, which I will take. the community and the internet have integrity. ”

Vibrant lawyers, meanwhile, loved with the resulttell Us In a statement, “Today’s opinion is a complete victory and a complete justification for Blake Lively, along with those who Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties dragged to his vengeful legal cause, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times. “

Attorney Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb Continued: “As we have said from day one, this legal case ‘$ 400 million’ was false, and saw the court through it. We look forward to the next round, which seeks attorneys fees, treble compensation and penalty compensation

Justin Baldoni does not review claims against Blake Lively 2
Sony Pictures Release/Collect Everett

While Lively’s team were pleased with the judge’s verdict, they continued fight Taylor SwiftCommunicate With the actress to be protected from being used in the main trial. (Swift Song “My Tears Ricochet” was used in I.t ends with usBut Swift had no role in production. Was initially subjected by the Baldoni team but the court order was later rejected.)

Liman deny lively motion For a defensive routine of Swift Exchanges, texts with lively, indicate that the Baldoni team has the right to see it – but only in terms of the film.

A spokesman for a lively behalf responded to the judgment in a statement to UsWriting, “The court completely denied the parties offering to enforce documents from Ms. Lively, who has produced many more documents in this case than the Wayfarer parties combined. Further, the court’s defensive order judgment depends on the admission of the Wayfarer parties that no one received back exactly.

The statement continued, “As for the rest, Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties demand access to Taylor Swift private communications – though he has already subdued and then withdrawn that subpoena. Baldoni’s desire to drag Taylor Swift into this has been constantly dating back to August 2024, when the Public Relations Company led by Melissa Nathan included it in their ‘scenario planning’ document (lively revised complaint, exhibit d), he referred to as a bully, and called for a strategy to influence a fan, 214. Exploit the popularity of Ms Swift, which from day one has been nothing more than distracted from the serious sexual harassment and revenge accusations that the road parties face. “

Lively and Baldoni trial is scheduled for March 2026.

Source link