Judge blocks the issue of the Big Jury Epstein’s Materials

The US judge denied an application for investigation into the investigation of the late convicted Pedophile Financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Judge Robin Rosenberg found that the release of files from its case in Florida, a request that was made last week when the Trump administration faced mounting pressure on Epstein files, will violate state legislation.

The decision came when the Wall Street Journal published a story claimed that President Donald Trump is one of the hundreds, whose names are in the Epstein Investigation Documents conducted at the Ministry of Justice.

The White House press secretary called the report “no more than the continuation of false news, invented by Democrats and liberal media.”

The document reports that Trump’s name appeared with many others, including other loud figures. The name in these documents is not evidence of any violations.

BBC failed to check the report on its own.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the Ministry of Justice stated Trump that the documents had included alien to many people who have socialized with Epstin.

The Prosecutor General Pom Bondi also told the President that children’s pornography and sacrifice information that should not be published were among the records, the newspaper reports.

Trump ordered Bondi to seek out to release all the materials of the big jury, which forced the Ministry of Justice to ask the courts in Florida and New York to release files related to cases in both US states.

In his 12-page orders on Wednesday, Judge Rosenberg ruled that transcripts could not be released because of the recommendations governing the mystery of the great jury established by the Federal Appeal Court controlled by Florida.

“The court’s hands are linked,” she ordered.

The judge stated that the government’s argument last week that the files should be published from “widespread public interest” and “transparency for the American public” did not meet the requirements for the documents to dissolve under “special circumstances”.

The transcripts in question stems from Florida’s investigation into Epstein in 2006, which led to the accused of addressing a minor for prostitution.

She also refused to translate this issue into New York, where two judges separately decide whether it is necessary to scatter transcripts related to the 2019 EPStein sexual trafficking probe. This request is still considered.

Judge Rosenberg also decided to open a new case so that the lawyers could make additional legal arguments why transcripts should be released.

These court materials are preceded by a federal case that ended with Epstein’s death in New York when he was waiting for trial in 2019.

The judge’s decision came just before the Wall Street Journal reported that in May Trump informed the officials of the Ministry of Justice that his name appeared in investigative documents related to the Epstein.

Last week, the president asked the reporter whether he was told by the Attorney General in the files.

“No, no, she – she gave us a very fast briefing,” Trump replied.

Stephen Cheng, Trump’s press, called the report “no more than the continuation of false news, invented by Democrats and liberal media.”

The Ministry of Justice has similarly rejected the report, calling it “a collection of lies and penetration” aimed at pushing false history and getting clicks.

The ruling arises when interest returned back to Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted sex traffic, which has been serving 20 years of imprisonment for helping young girls Epstein.

A high official of the Ministry of Justice plans to meet with Maxwell to discuss his knowledge in this case, her prosecutor confirmed the BBC and sued her to show the case before the House of Representatives Committee.

The Republicans of the Committee on Supervision of the House sent a summons to Maxwell to speak to the body remotely from the prison on August 11.

Her lawyer David Oscar Marcus told the BBC that if she decides to testify rather than calling her constitutional right to remain silent, “she will testify true because she always said it would be.”

“As for the summons to Congress, Ms Maxwell is taking this step after another,” he added.

“She looks forward to her meeting with the Ministry of Justice, and this discussion will help you announce how it continues.”

The Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson warned that Maxwell could not be trusted to give accurate testimony.

“Can it be counted to tell the truth? Is it a reliable witness?” said Johnson.

“I mean that this is a person who has been convicted of many years of imprisonment for horrible, unspeakable, confessional actions and actions against innocent young people.”

During the campaign last year, Trump – who at one time was a member of Epstein – promised to release files related to a disgraced financier.

But Bondy said that at the beginning of this month the US Department of Justice did not find any Epstein “Customer Excuse”, which could concern loud associates, and that he took his own life – despite the conspiracies from his death.

The statement appeared after Bondi viewed that she was going to reveal serious disclosure.

She said it would include “a lot of names” and “Many flights” – a reference to those who traveled with the financier or visited his private islands, where many of his alleged crimes say.

Her reversal pushed an angry response from Trump’s most ardent supporters who urged Bondi to resign after they did not go to the list that officials had previously stated.

Democrats confiscated the Republican struggle to accuse Trump administration of lies about his commitment to transparency.

On Tuesday, Speaker Johnson closed the vote in the Congress for summer breaks earlier, trying to stop the efforts of the legislation on Epstein documents.

But the Republican rebels voted in the subcondition of the federal law enforcement agencies on Wednesday to force the Ministry of Justice to issue documents related to Epstein.

Three Republicans – Nancy Meissa, Scott Perry and Brian Jack – joined the five Democrats in voting for the summons. Two Republicans voted against it.

The Democrat rating on the panel reportedly surprised the Republicans, submitting voting during unrelated court hearings at invalid children’s migrants.

But James Camera, the Republican Chairman of the House Supervision Committee, must sign it in order for the legal summons to continue.