Josh Brolin is right why streaming sucks

By Drewsch
| Announce 1 hour ago

Josh Brolin has been making the press trip for Weapon (My review) And there is one quote that makes the rounds in streaming. Brolin said, “At the moment, with so much content, you just watch things on whatever streaming service you’re on, and you’re just going, ‘Fuck, why is this so boring, man? Why?’ And just go to the next thing.

It is not the most coherent and investigated debate, but Josh Brolin Provides a firm access point to a discussion as to why streaming programming suffers from unavoidable homogeneity. For a foreword, it is clear that great movies and series are produced for them only stream Platforms, but streaming selectivity and that business model have encouraged more … Let’s call it an algorithm friendly projects that are ultimately forgotten.

Therefore, it is worth arguing over a movie as Weapon so anti -critical to the streaming landscape.

Movies are still important creative platforms

Josh Brolin’s comment about streaming ties into a larger issue with what streaming has been made to films as an art form. The streaming landscape has devalued the location of film in terms of pop culture. With any number of services offering a catalog of seemingly infinite films, the special availability of films is no longer part of their appeal.

Except in the film theater. Giving theaters a new film display selectivity still causing the interest and excitement of the public. Weapon certainly proved that with its Box Office Performance. If you find a special filmmaker and encourage you, treat film production as special with a sizable budget, and sell it to people as a special experience, you usually finish with more special films than those who are assembled in a factory. That proves that films are still a large and sellable creative platform when you let truly creative people navigate the ship.

Streaming is face and that hurts movie makers like stars

Another important aspect of the specific debate that Josh Brolin makes about streaming is that it does not elevate a new generation of unique cinematic voices. Yes, Guillermo Del Toro has cemented a solid reputation NetflixBut he had set up that long before he arrived in bed with the streaming giant. You don’t see a lot of young writers’ writers get the spotlight because it’s behind the scenes.

That’s because streaming platforms have not encouraged a strong enough ecosystem (read: Without spending the marketing dollars) so that audiences feel drawn towards the creative people behind the camera. Streaming wants recognizable star actors and up and become very young because they act as brand emissaries by their nature of being seen. The creative people behind these projects are not nourished to be the next generation of making advanced -dalent films as generations before.

There is a larger conversation there in terms of changing management on corporate supervision rather than the old film studios and their management practices, let alone the growing cultural depreciation of artists and artistic professions across all media. But, I can only say so much before I get into trouble. So, let’s summarize this section by saying that streaming has not focused too much on putting the culture of the next Steven Spielberg.

Audiences want large surprises and streaming is in -desperate

It is clear that Josh Brolin is also talking about how streaming is not a place for storytelling and making truly radical films. Writer/director Zach Cregger wrote Weapon As an artist’s vision, it was not something that had been eaten and crafted by the data monkeys that each streaming service uses to reduce any dangerous enterprises.

Streaming often does not take the type of huge swings that films make because it is not cost effective for them to do so. It’s a more “sensible” way to do more Strangers (property itself infused in reference dialogue) or a reboot series of I know what you did last summer But “modern.” It multiplies a mindset of familiarity and comfort because that’s what streamers want: loyal subscribers who consider their content libraries as cozy, safe retreating to the expectation instead of paths for a real artistic exhibition.

Again, it is clear that great movies and shows argue on streaming platforms. But Josh Brolin is right for the model of streaming himself. Not surprisingly audiences or staging visionary creative people, and is films like Weapon That proves the film theater model still important as part of a cinema craft.