Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025 Continue to produce nail bites, and a heart cutter occurred Gujarat Titans (GT) Carved past The Mumbai Indians (MI) In a last ball thriller. However, the consequences of the game aroused more than an illusion. Legendary cricket Sunil Gavaskar stated his displeasure Hardik PandyaTactical options, especially his decision not to end the end and deliver responsibility Deepak Chahar Instead. With the hopes of Playoff of my thread hanging, Gavaskar’s criticism has added fuel to an already intense season.
Sunil Gavaskar calls Hardik Pandya
One of the most puzzling decisions of the rain affected by the rain was the absence of Hardik since the final. Hardik, known for his nerve and experience in high-pressure situations, Hardik chose not to lean, even with 15 runs to defend. Gavaskar quickly began to question this choice, remembering several times in which Hardik had delivered the final game winning match, including the memorable final of the World Cup of T20 2024 against South -Africa and the nerve finish against Bangladesh.
Hardik, who launched in the game and granted 18 runs, looked out of the pace. But Gavaskar insisted that the captain should have adopted the pressure and position instead of trusting in a less appropriate diaper. )He has done so before, in the biggest stages. That’s why you are the captain: you take the heat and pound“Gavaskar emphasized during his analysis on Jio Hotstar.
Also read: Hardik Pandya records an unwanted record as Gujarat Titans advanced the Mumbai Indians in a thriller
Gavaskar considers Deepak Chahar as a mistake for death
The other figure of Gavaskar’s radar was Chahar, who was given the unviable task of overturning the final. Chahar, known for his swing from the new ball to Powerplay, appeared visibly out of his element to death. In charge of defending 15 runs, fired under pressure, allowing Tewatia satisfied and Gerald Coetzee To achieve the victory for Gujarat Titans of the last installment.
Gavaskar criticized the decision, noting that Chahar has no experience in the last points and has rarely been used in these scenarios.
)It was probably one of those rare occasions when he was asked to close the game and unfortunately did not work“He added.
He also emphasized how the slow rate of me was a field penalty, reducing the field field by a player in the final, a crucial factor that possibly turned the game to GT.
The result has placed the Mumbai Indians in a fourth precarious place with 14 points, making each remaining match critical. Gavaskar’s observations responses emphasize the need for me to evaluate their strategies and leadership options quickly if they aim to keep them alive in Playoff’s career.
Also read: Fans burst when Gujarat Titans got ready to end the nail
