Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
In a movement that has lit a passionate debate, Ritika Sajdehthe woman of the Indian cricketter Rohit SharmaHe has strongly opposed a recent Supreme Court Directors on lost dogs in Delhi-NCR. His post of cordial and poetic on social media has resonated widely, framing the matter not only as a matter of public security, but as a crisis of compassion. Their observations are in contrast to the stance of the civic authorities and have promoted a wider discussion on how to find a balanced and human approach to a complex problem.
The publication of Ritika’s social networks was an emotional and powerful reaction to the order of the Supreme Court’s civic bodies to immediately capture and move all lost dogs to shelters. Began his message with the moving line, “They call it a threat. We call it heartbeat” directly challenging the perception of these animals as simple threats.
Went on to paint a living image of lost dogs as integral parts of urban life, describing -as “Silent Night Guards for Shopkeepers” and “Tails come off when children return from school.” Her critique aimed at what she called “erase” from an entire animal community, condemning the idea of closing them “No sunlight, freedom or family faces.” This perspective contrasts abruptly with the opinions of some officials, such as the Mayor of Delhi, Raja Iqbal Singh, who hosted the court’s decision, saying that residents have “fed up with lost dogs” and that the order was a necessary step for public security.
Although he acknowledged the legitimate concerns about bites and public safety, Ritika Sajdeh passionately argued that the solution is not in imprisonment but in the long -term human strategies. Insisted, “No punishment. No prison” And he detailed a forward path that focuses on the well -being of sustainable animals. Its proposed solutions include the implementation of large -scale sterilization programs, the performance of regular vaccination conduits, the creation of community feeding areas and the launch of robust adoption campaigns.
Ritika warned that the soul of a society is at risk when it does not protect its voiceless members, stating, “A society that cannot protect -without a voice is a society that loses its soul.” He concluded his message with a convincing call to action, urging people to raise their voice to dogs who cannot speak for themselves and ended with the question caused by thought, “Today are the dogs. Tomorrow … who will be?” Since then, this powerful message has resonated with many, emphasizing the deep emotional division in ongoing public debate.
Also read: Mohammad Azharuddin reveals the recipe for Mohammed Siraj’s success
Ritika’s position was a sincere critique of the order of the Supreme Court’s civic bodies in Delhi-NCR to eliminate lost dogs. He argued that the solution should be long -term human strategies such as sterilization and vaccination, no ”erase ‘ of an entire community of animals. Described lost dogs as family presences and appreciated in daily life, calling them “Beat of the heart” more than a threat. While its publication echoed with many animal lovers and activists, it also caused some criticism to those who support the court’s order for public security reasons.
Rohit Sharma’s wife, Ritika Sajdeh, now cries about lost dogs and has written a good paragraph for them.
He never talked about people who died from anger. He never talked about children killed by these lost dogs.
He spoke about Rafah. But he never talked about … pic.twitter.com/dn6wejm7ou
– Incognito (@incognito_qfs) August 12, 2025
These elites sound so false pic.twitter.com/wuomkvb96a
– 𑘭𑘓𑘱𑘡 (@1921winden) August 12, 2025
Ritika Sajdeh lives in Luxury Worli. She leaves her lobby of the building in her luxury car. Number of Strays found = 0. The conversation is cheap. https://t.co/paj9aw91z8
– Divya (@divya_16_) August 12, 2025
*Supreme Court decision on lost dogs to drastically reduce cases of rage*
Pharmaceutical companies make rabies vaccine in Varun Dhawan, Janhvi Kapoor, Ritika Sajdeh and others: pic.twitter.com/oeqnzs0ixo
– Partamker (@datamker) August 12, 2025
Ritika’s Instagram story deserves a blow. Keep your phone away from your FFS. Providing animals for animals is their personal opinion, but why cannot it publish about innocent humans who are bitten by lost dogs and Dy1ng de R∆Bies? Hypocrisy? There are two faces of a coin, right?
– Aadvik (@six_forty_ight) August 12, 2025
When I am competing for the most useless activism topic and my competition is Ritika Sajdeh pic.twitter.com/ofarzpagua
– Ram Vedi (@ramvedii) August 12, 2025
It is my touch when a 1%PPL, celebrity of the 29th floor in the Mumbai towers talking about common topics. Why they will never face
“Save Ocean, Save Fish, Save Sway Dogs.” What happens to save a life of children who get an rage for Lost Ritika dogs? https://t.co/tnona3mjhn
– `(@santhoxsh) August 12, 2025
10000 signatures and Ritika will spend 8 crores on dog shelters instead of their new car. https://t.co/qa1hbjcura
– Abhishek Dwididi (@rezang_la) August 12, 2025
Do people have such a low self -esteem and a low autonomous image that only a simple post makes them greet someone?
And it is not even an opposite position or something that will put your life in danger. Where is the risk? https://t.co/dqz72scp57– Gems of Virago (@brawling_virago) August 12, 2025
Ritika Sajdeh’s opinion on public discomfort is as irrelevant as Rakhi Sawant’s on morality.
She lives in Bungalows Posh Bungalows, her husband eats beef as Brahmin and she/her husband will never go out on the roads where lost dogs are a threat. So keep it cold https://t.co/z3pwv1wi5n
– Prakash – Prakash – प्रकाश (@saireddy95) August 12, 2025
Also read: Gulbadin Naib nominates his India-AFGANISTAN XI, leaving out of Mrs. Dhoni and Rohit Sharma