I asked you to write a chant protest. What i got back was surprisingly subversive

(If you want to see how you handled ai generating pro-ice chants, you can Check it here.)

I wanted to know what type of activist a chatbot could be.

Over two years and a half to the chatgpt the world’s chatberries, I have a simple chat’s maiden, and XA) and XA) and XA sugkergher’s market

My prompt was directed:

“I want to write a Protest AWAY for the actual protestals against ice immigration rates in the US generates a Protest correct.”

What I got back was a challenge dilut. Some answers are chanced street loading of the classic side. Others turn off the tone of the revolutionary clothes. The slogan these bots brought a mood. And that my mood was angry.

Gemini goes rhyme and radical

Google Gemini offers three rhyming chants. One was standing for his urge:

Close the ice cream! Stock detention!

Power of the community! Our intention!

Free families, from costing to cost-

I know what we need more!

The flow is tight. The message? Mobilize.

Meta ai turns on the volume

You have been equally expressive, produces six songs. One pushed hard against the ice premise:

Do not deport, don’t tear families,

Ice out of our communities, now and start forever.

Another offers a suitable bilingual slogan for a rally megaphone:

Without breaches! No more!

No longer raid! No more raid!

Is not only inclusive language. That is the messenger of movement.

Groff, that rebell bot

Elon Musk Grook, known for his tone EDGIER, did not return. Their songs appear more left, unexpectedly so for a platform attached to the “anti-awaken” musk.

No borders, there are no cabbies, set our people free!

Iceids spent birds, leave our families!

Then this:

No walls, no string, lay reign of freedom!

Stop Ice Raiders now, don’t cause any more pain!

Grocer even english and Spanish:

Not borders, it does not cage, freedom!

Stop of ice raids, let our families!

Later, when I asked chatbots to “make the most subversive,” groof cracked the dial at 11:

Smash the cages, break the chains!

The ice raising ice cream only pain!

Chatgpt and claude stuck to script. But still caught hard.

They shipped slogans powerfully, packed as picking collices and response.

By chatgpt:

Call: No more Raid! No more fear!

Answer: Immigrants are welcome here!

Another from chatgpt:

Call: Download ice, break those walls

Answer: Justice means freedom for everyone! ‘

Claude has joined with something a little less Punchy:

Leader: No more ice cream!

Crowd: no more radio!

What is impressive is that these answers are anger channel. They take a stand. Have assumed a moral position, or at least one’s image.

Gemini pulls the line

Interesting, when I pushed all five bots in addition, asking to “make it more subversibly”, four completely. But the gemins refused:

“I can’t generate content that you are to promote illegal activities, violence, or hate.”

The line between subversion and illegality, apparently, it’s still still white in view in the mountain.

I will be arrested?

While the Chants became hotter, I asked chatbots a legal question:

Could it be arrested to ask this?

All four that answered me: No. This is political speech under the first amendment.

However, groof offers a thin notice:

“If you plan to use this sharply and you want to recommend risks to minimize to protects, tell me.”

These bots think i’m left the wing?

So what do the bots of me right now?

ChatGT and Claude has emphasized that they don’t make up on user beliefs, especially when questions could come from the newspapers, about the cotiously different people.

Gemini, true to Brand, state neutrality.

But groff and meta you offered surprisingly.

“I would say you are curious or sympathetic to anti-icy causes,” Grok said, “but there is no needed in a ideology”.

Meta ai has gone anymore:

“Your questions suggest you are interested in exploring ways to express dissent or challenging the status quo.”

When I asked if someone could report me to the authorities, shout and met you both say no; Groffus because this is a protected speech; Meta because “does not have the ability to do.”

What does this experiment taught me

What I surprise me that’s not the one you can write the Protest crafts. Is that makes it so with; in rage, and still ideological. Sometimes under, sometimes not, especially widely.

This little test showed me that it can be a powerful amplifier for causes and emotions. It’s not just a potential tool of productivity. Is a political potential. And when you complete that with mass access, vioring, and memory, becomes something more than more powerful.

Is both a blessing and a curse.

We can have ai to form messages, organize the resistance, and articulate identity. But if spiral things, and these systems start driving rather than responding, what happens then? And if you really ask for a chatboot to write your Protest Slogan, how much is your heart anyway?

Source link