How accurate are Chernobyl HBO miniseries?

It is easy to say (and we /filmed for the time) that “Chernobyl” was the most vital, terrifying and relevant 2019 horror story. Based on the true story of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear plant accident and its result, HBO’s fascinating and intense miniseries depicts the disaster in serious and visual details which, at times, almost appeared as a documentary about an impossible horrific event.

Advertisement

Of course, it’s worth noting that very few people have any kind of personal reference point to nuclear disasters actually, so a viewer who doesn’t know the details of the real -life Chernobyl accident could find it difficult to decide whether the realism of the show was an unrestricted commitment to illustrate the events in a proper historical way, or was simply enchanting in its most capping. After all, Craig Mazin’s “Chernobyl” creator has gone on to do “the last of us,” which can often be just as visible but clearly based on a video game series. With that in mind, let’s look at how realistic HBO “Chernobyl” is really.

Craig Mazin’s “Chernobyl” Creator knew the show’s science is very importantAnd as such, the show’s aim was to do things as accurate as its historic drama miniseries licenses. This is not completely difficult when you consider how shocking many parts of the real story it is based on. Adam Higginbotham, author of “Midnight in Chernobyl,” said ” CBS News The dramatic scene of liquidator workers who have to remove radioactive debris from the roof of the power plant in Chapter 4, “Happiness of All Mankind,” could basically pass away as a documentary:

Advertisement

“They were timed for how long they could be out there, in seconds, to limit their exposure to what at the time was considered safe as it could be.”

The dedication to making the show as accurate as possible was not limited to the things that happened around the titular nuclear power plant, either. “Chernobyl” brings to life the specific view of the Soviet Union of the mid -1980s, to the point that places, clothing and objects are almost invariably accurate. Similarly, there are several key scenes that illustrate the way the Soviet system acted extremely loyal to reality. Chapter 1, “1:23:45,” conveys the core of a Soviet bureaucracy in the post-presidential actions (in) the leader of the Town Zharkov (Donald Sumpter), who decides to quarry the city and keep the residents in despite the risks it causes them. Similarly, the hearing of the Central Committee in Chapter 5, “Vichnaya Pamyat,” correctly shows the way in which trials worked at the time. More than that, people with direct experience about the disaster have praised the way “Chernobyl” captured the general atmosphere and people’s responses in general.

Advertisement

Of course, “Chernobyl” also took creative freedom. For example, heroic voluntary trio Alexei Anananko (Baltasar Bre Samer), Valeri Bezpalov (Philip Barantinini), and Boris Baranov (Oscar Giese) The first men were not to enter the basement full of water from the powerhouse at the event depicted in Chapter 2, “Stay calm,” and they were not approval or reward after they have completed their dangerous mission.

Advertisement

However, the biggest inconsistencies between real life and “Chernobyl” are in the way the show depicts people. The miniseries freely suggest that the authorities will get people shot at the slightest possibility of disobedience, which was not something that Mikhail Gorbachev’s Soviet Union did from the Mikhail Age-rather, it was more of a fight before the Second World War of Soviet life, and at this point the majority of threat was reported.

Show scientists, Valery Legasov (Jared Harris) and Ulana Khomoyuk (Emily Watson), are also fairly wrong. The show is quite open that Khomoyuk is a fictional character that represents the merger of the many researchers of the Chernobyl event, but even without considering, she and Legasov far Too conflict and accountable to call higher people on their quest to reveal the truths behind the event to have any place of influence in the Soviet system. In fact, the Soviet system did not have the type of individual heroes in the Western style and “Chernobyl” villains often focus, and it was widely known that Chernobyl power station was dangerous long before the disaster. As Adam Higginbotham noted in the CBS news interview:

Advertisement

“In fact, so many nuclear scientists knew all over that there were problems with this reactor – the problems that eventually led to an explosion and disaster.”