Google calls of Copyright weaken and the export rules in the proposal of the AI

Google, After the opename heels, Published a policy proposal In response to Trump Administration call for a National Administration Plan. The Gifote Activates the restricting the restricted to you, and also Balanced with the national social operations. “

“Your you need to have a active economic policy to notify American values ​​and innovation support the international internal”, Google wrote. “For a politics policy, AI, you have paid to the risks, often ignore the cost the wrong chapter can be started in the new administration.”

One of the most controversial Google controversial advice of the use of ip protect material.

Google sustains that “right use and the exception of mining data” are “critical” to scientific innovation and you linked. As they openThe company is looking for the right one and rivals to form on publicly available data – including copyright data – the largely unrestricted.

“Which exceptions allow the use of” available materials available for significantly impactively “, Google wrote, and distantly avoided the duly data.”

Google, that has repaintly formed a Number of models In public, copyright data, it is Statulling PROFESTABLE with data owners that accuse the company to fail to notify and compensate before you do. The US courts are yet to decide if the right doctors of the effective ai devel of the IP litigation.

In their policy’s proposal, Google also needs to issue with Some export checks set under the offer administrationthat says “can undermice of economic skills” to “pupils of the servants and that contrasts by statements from Google’s competitors as Microsoft, that in January said it was “trust” Could “fully” with the rules.

Impuedly, the export rule, who seek to limit the avanzai’s availability in disguise countries, carve examples to large clusters.

In an option in their proposal, Google calls “investigations of” sustainu “to product r & d, push the recent fedie efforts Reduce expenditure and delete grant prizes. I am The company said the government must set up the data set that may be use for the commercial training, and assigned the “principle of comprehension and models are” largely available “

Cuts to Great Great Regulator Crete of US, Google Regulatory I originate by Fedalic Legislation on the AI, including privacy and security and security included. Only more than two months in 2025, The number of bills are you pending in the United States is grown at 781according to an online trailing device.

Google the American government against what allows an honoring obligations around the AI ​​systems, as an obligation of dubbs. In many cases, google argums, the developer of a model “has not visibility or control” above as it should be used and so model should not be responsibility for misuse.

Historically, Google has opposite law as the companies defeated sb 1047, which clearly willing That constitute a developer ai have to be reprimanding a pattern and in which the developers cases may be liable for modeling damage.

“Even in cases where a developer provides a model directly to the deplications often be better to understand the risks of effective risk managing, and run
Monitoring and logging “, Google wrote.

Google in their proposal even calls of disk of discarding as those of being “in verbosity has been wide” and told the national commonly needed “

A growing number of villages and past states have given up on developers ai to reveal more about how their systems work. Is it Ab-2013 Send that companies ai publics a summary of high level of data set they used to form their systems. In the eu mi, to fulfill the act once you come in should be programming with a lot of lot on the detailed instructions on the operation, limitations with the pattern.