Generative AI redorates the American labor market, shows Stanford study

Standford’s study revealed evidence that the broad acceptance of the generative II affects the prospects for early career.

Vertigo3d | E+ | Gets the image

Growing proof that the broad acceptance of the generative II affects the prospects of workers, according to A document published on Tuesday Three Researchers University Stanford.

The study analyzes wages from millions of US workers generated by ADP, the largest US Savior Savior Savior

The report revealed that “early, large -scale evidence that corresponds to the hypothesis that the AI ​​revolution began to exert a significant and disproportionate impact on entry -level workers in the US labor market.”

First of all, the results showed that workers between the ages of 22 and 25, which are most subjected to II – such as customer service, accounting and software development – are observed by 13% employment decrease since 2022.

In contrast, employment for more experienced workers in the same fields and workers of all ages at less subjected professions, such as care assistants, remained sustainable and grew. For example, jobs for young health assistants grew faster than their old colleagues.

The roles of production managers and operations on the fronts also showed an increase in employment for young workers, although this growth was less than for workers under the age of 35.

The potential impact of the II on the job market causes concern in the branches and age groups, but it seems that Stanford’s study shows that the results will be far from homogeneous.

The study sought to eliminate the factors that could distort the data, including education levels, remote work, outsourcing and broader economic shifts that could affect decision -making.

According to Stanford’s study, their conclusions may explain why national employment growth for young workers was stagnant, while the overall employment remained largely after the world pandemic, despite the recent signs.

Young workers said that the AI ​​could replace “codified knowledge” or “book training” that comes from formal education. On the other hand, AI can be less able to replace knowledge that comes from many years of experience.

Researchers also noted that not all use of II is related to employment decline. In professions where II complements work and used for efficiency, muted changes in employment rates have occurred.

The study-which has not been reviewed-re-reviewed, shows the installation evidence that AI will replace the jobs, the topic that is passionately discussed.

Previously this month, a Goldman Sachs Economist said the changes to the American laboratory The generative II arrival has already been found in the employment data, especially in the technological sector and among young employees.

He also noted that most companies have not yet launched artificial intelligence for everyday use, which means that the impact of the labor market will not yet be implemented.

Source link