Experts point out that a new Trump’s ban is shying away from pitfalls that the latest attempts are facing

US President Donald Trump has issued a wide new journey for traveling for people from 12 countries, having revised the policy of his first term.

However, there are some key differences.

The initial ban on travel has suffered a number of legal defeats. This time it appears to be developed to avoid the same pitfalls.

His predecessor, which focused on seven mainly Muslim countries and was called “Muslim Ban” by critics, was prescribed only a week after Trump took over in 2017 during his first term in the White House.

The ban twice made the Office to overcome court problems after opponents claimed that it was unconstitutionally and illegally because it discriminated against travelers based on their religion.

In 2018, the Supreme Court was supported by a scalable version, which this new ban is very reminiscent.

Legal experts told the BBC that Trump seemed to learn the lessons on the first attempt.

Christie Jackson, an expert on immigration in the US at the London company Laura Devine Immigract, said the new ban was more legally reliable.

While the first lacked “clarity”, the new restrictions were “wider in the sphere” and “clearly determined” the exceptions, she said.

Although there are some similarities in the 2017 countries, and the ban on 2025, the Muslim states are not a clear purpose of the last order.

Barbara Maccad, Professor of the University of Michigan University and former US prosecutor Michigan, said Newshour World Service BBC, which, probably, will win the Supreme Court’s approval if it was sent to this level.

12 countries that are subject to the most severe restriction since June 9 are mostly in the Middle East, Africa and the Caribbean, including in Afghanistan, Iran and Somalia.

There will be partial restrictions on travelers from another seven countries, including Cuban and Venezuelan citizens.

Trump said the power force would be assessed against the severity of the perceived threat, including terrorism.

But except for Iran, none of the 12 countries affected by the open ban is named in the US government sponsors list.

The video reported on the X, Trump quotes on Sunday in Baulder, Colorado, in which the man was accused of throwing Molotov cocktails at protesters attending a march for Israeli hostages.

The alleged attacker was a national Egyptian. However, Egypt is not on any list.

Trump has also identified high rates of people who exceed visas as the reason for the list of some countries.

However, Stephen D Heller, the Immigration Lawyer, said that the “lack of clarity” that the threshold had to meet an overriding level of the country so that this country is located on Trump’s ban. This can be the basis for a successful legal task, he suggested.

“When they rely on this concept of excessive rates of overpowers … They must determine what it really means,” he said BBC.

Unlike the first prohibition, which was supposed to last only 90 to 120 days, today’s order has no ending date.

In the targeted countries, he was met with disappointment.

Venezuela called the Trump administration “the upper reaches who believe that they possess the world”, although the Somalia pledged to “conduct a dialogue to solve the problems that arose.”

The initial prohibition pushed mass protests and sowed chaos at the US airports.

It was abolished in 2021 by Trump’s successor, President Joe Biden, who called the policy “spots on our national conscience”.