Eric and Lale Menendez, which sounded, began at Los -Angeles

After decades spent in the prison, Eric and Lille Menendez – and months of controversial fights – the judge will hear arguments about whether the brothers should be offended, in the event of a murder that is still sharing America.

The couple drops in life for the murder of parents, Kitty and Jose Menendez, in 1989, when they were 21 and 18. Their business has received attention after a popular Netflix series last year.

Hearing impaired on Thursday determine whether the couple should be covered for a less punishment. If you approve it, the brothers may be entitled to parole – to potentially allow their freedom.

At the time, the prosecutors claimed that Eric and Lyle carefully planned the killings so that they could access their parents. The current prosecutor of the Los -Angeles district says the brothers continue to cling to lies in this case.

But the lawyers of the brothers have long claimed that the killings were an act of self -defense and claimed that their father had been abusing them for years. They also pointed to the court, which details their rehabilitation in bars.

Here’s what you can expect from the hearing – and the resume of how we got here.

The brothers shot their parents with shooting in their mansion Beverly -Hills. A long -time discussion was conducted on their motive.

The prosecutor’s office painted them during lawsuits as spoiled rich children who wanted to access $ 14 million (£ 10.7 million). They claimed that the duo methodically bought the rifles and opened fire on their parents 13 times when the couple watched the TV – before you go out for gambling, at parties and on purchases.

The brothers ultimately confessed to the murder of but claimed that they acted with self-defense after many years of emotional, physical and sexual abuse by his father Jose, a highly powerful leader of the label.

The 1993 brothers trial was one of the first high -profile murders that were shown on television by seizing the audience in the US and worldwide.

It ended in a standstill, but in 1996, the brothers were convicted of the first degree in the second lawsuit, during which the judge banned many of his demands on sexual abuse. They are in prison near San Diego.

The judge will consider evidence, hear from the witnesses and eventually determine whether Eric and Lila should be.

It will not be a repeat lawsuit and the wine will not be a question. Much of the focus may be on what the brothers have done in 30 years of imprisonment.

Listening – which will not be broadcast – will start on Thursday in Los -Angeles and are also scheduled to go on Friday, although it can complete in one day.

Both sides – the lawyers of the Meendessa brothers and the district prosecutor’s office – will argue why brothers should or should not be offended.

They will also be able to call people to testify. This may include a wide range of people involved in the pursuit of the brothers in the 1990s, or in prison officials who have been talking about the last 30 years of brothers.

We will probably hear from the Meendess family members, many of whom have become Open supporters of Eric and Lila’s release. But at least one family member was a tough critic of efforts to release them.

Milton Anderson, who is Brother Kitty Menendez, called the Brothers “cold blood” and claimed that the couple should remain behind bars for “horrific act”.

This is unclear. If they did it, it would notice a significant moment in this case and will leave them open for questions from prosecutors who oppose their release.

Earlier, the couple spoke remotely at the video hearings. BBC asked if they would appear in person and whether they will testify.

In a recent episode of his podcast, lawyer Mark Geragos said he did not decide whether to call them on the booth.

“I know now that I’m going to put family members on the stand,” Mr. Heroras said. “I know now I will put correctional officers on the stand. Now I know I can put behavioral scientists.”

The District Prosecutor’s Office did not similarly say who plans to call to testify.

After the two-day hearing, Los Angeles County Judge Michael Jessic will make a decision on whether the brothers should.

But it is unclear whether it will come when the hearings are concluded or later.

Even if Judge Esic rules in favor of the fact that the brothers were insulting, they would not be released immediately.

What next will depend on what type of sentence the judge offers the brothers. There is a possibility that they may be given a new, smaller sentence that will make them immediately accept the right to parole.

But the right does not guarantee the release; They will still need to convince the State Council of Parish Releration that they no longer pose a danger to society.

Either the judge may select the changed sentence that reduces their punishment, but does not immediately open the door to parole. In this case, the brothers could face a few more years behind bars before getting right.

The Menenedees brothers filed a petition in 2023, which detail about the new evidence claiming that their father as a child and requesting their convictions.

The data included a statement about the rape of a former Band Menudo boy member, Roy Dislled, and Eric Menendez’s letter wrote his cousin eight months before the killings, which detail about abuse.

At the time, the chief prosecutor La, George Gaskon, announced that he supported justice a few days before the November 2024 election. He denied that the statement was political and claimed it was a long time ago.

The announcement of the Gascon happened shortly after the popular Netflix documentary and television drama welcomed the new generation. Many of the supporters of the brothers believe that if they were put to court today, their abuse accusations will be perceived more seriously – potentially leading to a completely different result.

After Gaskon lost the re -election application, Nathan Hochman took over his office and the case of Meendez. Hochman force came out against their request, and said that the brothers continued to follow Litania “lies”.

“They did not show a complete idea of ​​their crimes,” he said. But Hochman reproached the judge who allowed to ask for ahead.

The brothers followed three ways, trying to win their freedom. The remaining two:

1. California Governor’s premises: This may mean a reduced verdict or even a pardon, but not to cancel the brothers’ criminal convictions. Governor Govin News ordered the Council of Parish Liberation to assess the risk to determine whether they were a danger to society. Planned to hear in June to discuss the conclusions
2. New test: Brothers’ lawyers also asked for a new trial, pointing to the alleged abuse of parents and claiming that the jury should be able to consider a smaller sentence, such as murder. Hochman protrudes against this