Epstein Trump’s strategy may lift it against faithful fans

As Donald Trump continues to be subjected to issues related to the processing of his administration possible files related to the deceased sexual offender Epstein, he relies on a tested and true strategy.

The problem for the president, however, is that his attack plan could unintentionally abolish him against some of the most loyal supporters.

In a long social mail on Wednesday morning, Trump started a friend – accusing Epstein’s dispute of “radical left Democrats”. According to him, this episode is only the last in the long line of “hoax” made by its political opponents to knock it down.

“These scams and hoaxes are all the Democrats that are good,” he wrote. “They are not good in driving, not good in politics, and nothing good choose candidates.”

In the past, Trump has used such rhetoric with the United States at the same time to unite his fans on his side-counting himself as a fighting champion of outsiders and dissatisfied, who is confronted with privileged and rich.

However, the potential shortage of the president’s strategy became apparent halfway through his post when he appealed to the guilty party and his own supporters in the fall for what, he said, was the left scheme.

“My past fans bought in this” nonsense “,” Huk “,” Line “and” Sin “,” he wrote.

During his remarks, later, Trump continued to blame his own side in the Oval office, saying that “some stupid Republicans, some stupid Republicans, hit the net.”

The President draws the fighting lines on Epstein, which shares his side. It also risks cutting the basics on which its political force is being built.

Trump’s success was dietary with two central messages to his supporters – that he is an outsider who fights a corrupt institution and what he says about it. At a time when many voters say they are tired of polished politicians who change their views, Trump’s base perceives him as a true and controversial, but honest.

Trump, which never shies away from the theories of the wild conspiracy and those who accept them now claim that there is no “reliable” evidence concerning the rich and powerful in the Epstein case and that those who believe in the opposite are the suckers or fools.

Its convenient comments — The fact that Epstein files should be released, that there are no files, that any possible files are hoaxes-also make it look less than a straightforward and more like a person with something to hide.

He has a problem attempted to prove the negativity. And at the moment, some of his fans do not buy it.

In an interview with Politico, the Conservative Firebrand Laura loomer warned that if Trump does not change the course, Epstein’s history may “consume” his presidency. Her advice will appoint an independent investigator to consider this case – one Trump to follow, given how he went against past special lawyers.

But the success of his strategy to blame political opponents can work only if the Democrats take the bait.

Dan Pfeifer, who worked as a senior advisor to President Barack Obama, recently wrote that he could avoid this trap, enhancing the division in the ranks “Make America again.”

“If this issue becomes too related to the democratic efforts to harm Trump, it will polarize this issue along the party line and push the dissatisfied voters back to Trump’s camp,” he wrote in his last newsletter.

At the moment, the government calls for additional information about Epstein, is a rare source of consensus among the American public. Yougov poll showed that 79% of Americans want the government to release “all the documents it has.” This included 75% of Republican respondents and 85% of the Democrats.

The internal democratic poll received by Politico showed that 58% of respondents believed that Trump “maybe or certainly” participated in cover.

If polls are certainly tilted against Trump, republican owners – men and women who are obliged to remain in good predestination of the president – mostly continue to follow him.

This week, the Republicans Congress support the president’s legislative agenda, despite their narrow majority. And although some called for more transparency, the Conservatives in the House of Representatives repeatedly questioned democratic attempts to mount all other Epstein files.

The Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson, who oversee the efforts, went back to the comments earlier, urging to reveal more Epstein files, saying that he was wrong and wanted only the public to see “reliable” information – the same language used.

At the moment, Epstein’s history is unpleasant for the president who is accustomed to bend the news cycle and national attention to his will. With Republicans who control Washington, the dispute will apply its presidency only if Trump’s own allies allow.

If Trump’s discontent are grunting and dissatisfied with Trump’s believers, it can definitely receive a large number of the Republican Party in the election in the intermediate congress of next year, when voter enthusiasm usually determines which party prevails.

And if the Democrats highlight the control of one or both houses of Congress – and receive their supporting investigative powers – Epstein files and Trump’s connection with them can move from a political side show to the central ring.