ENG VS IND: Stuart Broad names two black changes that India should take into account for Edgbaston test

Former England cummer Stuart Broad he has criticized IndiaThe team selection for the first test against England in Headingley, calling it a large tactical amount. India, despite publishing five centuries in two tickets, lost the game by five doctors after England pursued a record goal of 371 years.

Stuart Broad indicates India’s selection error in Headingley

According to Broad, a key motive of India’s failure was the field decision Shardul Thakur Instead of the spinner of the left arm wrist Kuldeep Yadav. Speaking in the podcast of love for the cricket, he emphasized that the conditions in Edgbaston and the traditional vulnerability of England against the turn of the wrist made Kuldeep an ideal option.

The Indian bowling attack on the first test had no control in crucial moments, especially during the persecution of England. While Shardul Thakur It offers the depth of shaking, his bowl had no penetration and Kuldeep’s ability to carry variety and deceive the batters with his turn to the wrist was lost much.

Broad believed that Kuldeep’s inclusion would have given India a strategic advantage, especially as an attacking approach to England Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullumFamously called “Bazball”, he has shown signs of fighting the turn of the quality wrist. Broad suggestion is aligned with previous analysis of Kuldeep’s effectiveness, especially when combined with a high -pressure rhythm attack led by Jasprit bumrah.

“I think they have mistaken their team selection, if I am honest. Kuldeep Yadav should have played instead of Shardul Thakur. Especially with the type of pitch and the well -known struggle of England against the wrist turn, Kuldeep could have made a big difference.” Broad said to “For the love of the cricket”.

Also read: Rohit Sharma reveals the non -known hero behind the T20 World Cup of India 2024 Triumph

Broad rests another star player for Edgbaston if Bumrah is rested

We look forward to the second test at Edgbaston, Broad floated another idea: If Bumrah rests on the part of India’s workload management plan, the team should consider delivering a debut on the left arm sewing Arshdeep Singh. Broad argued that Arshdeep’s natural angle and ability to swing the ball at the beginning could be a valuable asset in English conditions.

While Prasidh Krishna It showed signs of improvement in the second post, Broad felt that the Indian attack, as a unit did not have the sting and consistency needed to break collaborations and maintain the pressure. Arshdeep, who has taken 66 doctors in 21 first class games to an average of 30.37, could provide a very necessary freshness and a variation of the left arm. However, Akash Deep’s competition can complicate selection decisions, especially with India that is now in the series and under pressure to recover.

“If Bumrah will rest in Edgbaston, he would be tempted to take Arshdeep Singh. The left arm angle and his ability to rotate the ball could offer something different from India’s bowling attack. While Prasidh Krishna improved at the second post, the attack had control and control of the victim. Broad conclusion.

Also read: ENG VS IND: 3 players who can replace Jasprit Bumrah in the second test at Edgbaston