ENG VS IND: Shubman Gill reveals why Ben Stokes’ ‘Handshake’ was rejected on the 5th of Manchester test

The tensions ran to Old Trafford as a Fourth test between India and England It did not end with a blow, but with a statement. With only 15 big ones left on the 5th, the captain of England Ben Stokes Was approaching Indian baptisms Ravindra jadaja and Washington SundarProposing an early end of the party: a regular hand that would officially settle for a draw. The Indians, however, declined, continuing to beat, both jad and Sundar approached more and more personal milestones. This decision caused a widespread debate, causing the Indian captain Shubman gill To explain the reason for not accepting the blow.

Shubman Gill Clear the air for not accepting Ben Stokes’s hand

On the 5th, with India, who had returned to the position of nearly without problems, both jad and Sundar were over the voices, a particularly significant feat, given the necessary pressure and resilience. Feeling the inevitability of a tie, Stokes suggested to end the game soon. Instead, Jadja and Sundar, supported by their captain and locker room, chose to continue to beat.

In Gill’s words, the choice was “Remove the wick from the equation“Focusing on experimenting each ball and taking the game as deep as possible. He added,”We thought they deserved a century there

The result? The two batters reached their respective centuries, gaining not only statistics, but also the admiration of the fans for their grid and their determination under the fire. This did not look good with Stokes and some members of the English contingent, causing a war of words and eyes heated on the pitch. Stokes even saw sarcastically consulting, “Do you want to mark a hundred against Harry Brook?“As he handed the ball to his part -time bowl in protest.

Also read: WTC 2025-27: Updated point table after Ing vs Ind 4a test

The spirit of the game debate is lit again after the controversy

The incident quickly transcended the ropes of the limit, with cricketers, commentators and past fans who weighed. Was it the spirit of the cricket to reject an early tie when the game had already been saved? Or was it a fair reward for a heroic comeback forged by two batters at a strong pressure?

The English Pundits suggested that they would have accepted the draw if the roles were reversed, emphasizing the test of the test cricket, playing hard but just and respecting groups about individual hits. In the meantime, the Indian voices insisted that the departure during the century, especially after being under a “tremendous pressure”, was approximately more than one number. As Gill said, “Every time you walk wearing the whites in the country, there are some Jitters. This explains how much I care to play in the country“. For Jadja and Sundar, reaching triple figures was a well -deserved conclusion for an exhibition of national resilience and pride.

Then the stroke – or lacking them in the wider battle between tradition and ambition in the modern age of the game. Old Trafford’s drama, driven by two centuries and a rejected hand rejected, will live for a long time in memory at a time when the personal milestones and the spirit of the team converge, and tested the latter complexity of the cricket for all debates.

Also read: ENG VS IND: Fans go to Gaga as Shubman Gill, Ravindra Jadja and Washington Sundar, tons secure a tie for India in Manchester

Source link