Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
England and India They are currently fighting it on the second test From the five -game series to Edgbaston in Birmingham. After suffering a strong defeat in the opening test at Headingley, visitors were expected to return with one side of the entire force. However, the absence of rhythm header Jasprit bumrahThat he was rested for the game, surprised many.
The decision was not good with Indian fans and several cricket experts, especially taking into account India Trail 0-1 of the series. Bumrah, who was essential in the recent hits of India, including his triumph of the World Cup of T20, was out as part of the management of the workload, an explanation that has not convinced everyone.
Ravi Shastri goes out to the team management to rest Jasprit Bumrah
Former main coach of India Ravi Shastri His words were not specified, as he criticized the team’s management for became Bumrah in such a fundamental meeting. Speaking during a discussion about Sky Sports, Shastri called into question the logic behind the play, especially after a break for a week after the loss of India in Leeds.
“I think Michael (Atherton) asked the question to the launch, if we look at the race that India has had, it becomes a very important test game. You have lost 3 against New Zealand, 3 against Australia and you have lost the first test game here.” Shastri said.
“You have to gain ways again. You have the best fast diaper in the world and make it sit after 7 days off. It’s a very difficult thing to believe,” he added.
India Playing XI sees three changes for Edgbaston’s test
In addition to resting Bumrah, India made two more changes to its programming for the Edgbaston test. Sai Sudharsan He was abandoned after a quiet debut, while India brought three fresh faces: Akash Deep, Washington Sundarand Nightish Kumar Reddy.
Akash replaced Bumrah in the Pace department, while Sundar and Reddy were added to strengthen the comprehensive side capacities on the side. The movement, however, has raised the eyebrows with critics questioning if India should have prioritized experience on experimentation in a coincidence of this importance.
