Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The dramatic fourth test between England and India At Old Trafford has caused a burning “Word War” between ancient South South Fast Bullet Dale Steyn and Tabraiz ShamsiHighlighting a fundamental disagreement about cricket ethics. The controversy was lit when the captain of England Ben Stokes Is offered to finish the game ahead of time, only for Indian baptisms Ravindra jadaja and Washington Sundar Refuse the proposal, choosing to beat in search of individual centuries.
The shock of the perspective between Tabraiz Shamsi and Dale Steyn on a controversial handback in Manchester test
While Shamsi carefully defended the actions of the Indian duo as a right, Steyn offered a unique and provocative counterargument, which suggested that, after fixing a tie, chasing “free milestones” was not entirely in the spirit of the game, even if it were within the rules. The controversial final hour at Old Trafford quickly climbed in a public debate between two prominent South Bolters -African, revealing different philosophies on the sportsmanship and autonomy of the players. Spinner of the left arm wrist.
Shamsi was one of the first to vocalize his support for Indian batters, directly challenging criticism against them. Ax (before Twitter), Shamsi questioned with passion for the fall, saying, “Why is there a big problem about Indians who choose not to accept the offer to end the game in a tie immediately? The offer was made. The offer was rejected and had the right to take their choice, they won their 100 years that worked hard for the play.” Its position showed the belief that players are fully justified in using all the legitimate opportunities available within the rules of the game.
However, Pace’s legendary Bowler did not hesitate to offer a direct and nuanced response to Shamsi, starting a deeper immersion in the ethics of the situation. Steyn began his response with a convincing metaphor, saying, “Shamo This onion has many layers, and each will make someone cry. The only problem I see here is the only thing that people do not realize, the batters did not play during the 100 years, they were beating for a draw. This was the goal. Drawing the game. Once this was achieved and a result was out of the question that was offered a helping hand, is this the gentle thing that must be done well? It is not time to realize that they are safe and now say that we would not prefer some free milestones … Although inside the rules, it seems a bit, well, weird. That said, they did well, and perhaps the last minute they were approaching should have been more aggressive when reaching these goals, at least then, we could all agree, no team tried to do the other in this strange situation. “ He then articulated his basic statement, arguing that the main purpose of the Indian batters at that time was simply to achieve a tie, not to pursue centuries.
Why is there a big problem about Indians who choose not to accept the offer to end the game in a tie immediately?
The offer was made .. The offer was rejected and had the right to take their choice
They got their 100 years for whom they worked hard
Game
– Tabraiz Shamsi (@Shamsi90) July 28, 2025
Shamo This onion has many layers and each will make someone cry. The only problem I see here is the only thing that people do not realize, the batters did not play during the 100 years, they were beating for a tie. This was the goal. Draw the game. Once this was achieved and one …
– Dale Steyn (@Dalestyn62) July 28, 2025
Also read: James Anderson’s wife still hates Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum: Here’s why
Steyn’s call for Aggression and Sports Integrity in Dead Gums
Steyn explained, “The only problem I see here is the only thing people do not realize, the batters did not play during the 100 years, they were beat by a tie. This was the goal. Draw the game,” He firmly believed that once this main goal was achieved and a result was definitively out of reach, accepting the hand that Ben Stokes offers would have been the “gentleness to be done”, Steyn’s critical point was that, although technically allowed, it was not the right time for the bathers to take advantage of his safe position and chase – “Free Fix”. Find this act “A little, well, strange”
Steyn, although critical of the decision to prolong the party, recognized the impressive performance of Ravindra Jadja and Washington Sundar, saying, “That said, they did well.” However, he suggested an alternative and more sporty approach if to achieve individual centuries was really his goal. Steyn proposed that if the milestones were a significant goal, the batters should be pursued with greater aggression in their entries, especially as the final hour approached and the draw became an undeniable certainty.
“Well, I don’t think any individual calls the traits for as long as someone can beat, it’s just the rule that teams can shake with an hour. Tank to get us out of this field!
Well, I don’t think any individual calls the shots for as long as someone can beat, it’s just the rule that teams can shake with an hour left.
The game was a triumph, India was going to push, Time says it makes no sense to play, none of the teams will win/lose so that the hits hand …– Dale Steyn (@Dalestyn62) July 28, 2025
