Elton John and Dua Lipa are looking for protection against AI

Dua Lipa, Sir Elton John, Sir Jan McKelen and Florence Welch are on the list of stars calling the Prime Minister to update copyright laws in such a way that protects them from artificial intelligence.

In a letter signed by more than 400 British musicians, writers and artists addressed to Sir Kirey, he says that he will not provide this defense, he will mean that they “give” their work to technology companies.

Also, as they write, it is “the UK’s position as a creative power plant”.

They want the Prime Minister to support the amendment to the bill on the use and access of the bill), which will require transparent developers with the owners of the copyright to use the materials for the preparation of AI models.

A government’s press secretary said: “We want our creative industries and AI companies to flourish, and so we consult on the packaging of measures that we hope will work for both sectors.

“We realized that no changes would be considered unless we are fully satisfied that they work for the creators,” they added.

Other subscribers include Kazuo Ishigura’s author, David Zayatsi playwright, Kate Bush and Robbie Williams, as well as ColdPlay, Tom Stoppard and Richard Curtis.

Sir Paul McCartney who said BBC in January He was concerned that the II thwarted the artistsHe also signed a letter.

“We are creators of wealth, we think and promote national stories, we are innovators of the future, and AI needs us as much as energy and computer skills,” the statement said.

They say their problems may be satisfied if the government supports the amendment proposed by Biban Biban Kidron before the key vote in the Lord House on Monday.

Baronez Kidron’s amendment, as they say, “will allow both the developers of the II and the creators to develop licensing modes that will create the content created by man in the future.”

Not everyone agrees with the approach of artists.

Julia Wilimins, co -founder of the British Progress Analytical Center, said such proposals may interfere with the UK and its growth application.

These measures “do nothing to prevent foreign firms from using content from the British creative industry,” she said to the BBC.

“The restrictive copyright regime will be in the offshore development of II, the refrigerator of internal innovations and directly harm the UK economy,” she said.

However, the letter is concerned by the artists about the inclusion of their works and materials protected by copyright in the data used to develop AI generative systems.

These tools that can create new content in response to simple text clues are becoming more popular and accessible to consumers.

But their opportunities were accompanied by problems and criticism about their use and demand for energy.

In February, artists, including Annie Lennaks and Damon Albar, released a silent album to protest the changes of copyright law proposed by the government.

The government has advised its proposal to allow developers to be able to use the content of the creators on the Internet to help develop their models if the owners did not choose to “refuse”.

According to Guardian, the ministers reviewed the proposal After the creator’s reaction.

Mr. Ishigura pointed the BBC to an earlier statement, in which he wrote: “Why is it fair and fair – why is it reasonable – change our copyright legislation to use mammoth corporations at the expense of individual writers, musicians, creators and artists?”

The author of the Nobel Prize added that since then, the only limited promotion was that it seemed now that the government had accepted that the refusal was most likely not able to, he believed that the new counseling to find a more fair scheme, though it remains to see how significant the consultation would be.

“It is important that they get this right,” he wrote.

Recently, the deputies rejected a separate amendment made by Baroness Kidron, which aims to force AI developers accountable copyright law.

She now says that transparency commitments for technology firms within the new proposed amendment can support the development of licensing agreements between creators and companies.

“The UK is in a unique position to take its place as a global player on the AI ​​international supply network, but in order to understand this opportunity, the transparency provided in my amendments that are needed to create a live licensing market,” said Baranya Kidron.

In his statement, the government stated: “It is important that we take the time to work through the range of answers, but it is equally important that we now set the basis, consider the following steps.

“That is why we have pledged to publish a report and evaluation of economic impact – studying a wide range of issues and options on all sides of the discussion.”