Elon Musk emerges over the jury’s choice in the death rate from Autopilot Tesla

Tesla CEO Elon Musk Not in the Miami courtroom on Monday, but his name was great because the jury was chosen for the federal lawsuit over the civil lawsuit as a result of the 2019 Tesla Model S Catastrophe, which died the pedestrian and left another bad wounded when the car was in a car in the car, Autopilot Mode.

“Everything related to Elon Musk is very difficult for me,” said one of the potential jurors.

Another future juror said that it could not be just and impartially for Tesla because of “ethics, ownership of the company and what I saw in the news of his attitude to the government.”

To the right is the first lawsuit against Tesla related to the deadly accidents related to the electric car autopilot to go to the trial.

And this happens a few months after Moscow’s work as the President’s Higher Advisor Donald Trump Made a billionaire home name, synonymous with large -scale federal workforce shutters that have been launched by his children, the Department of Government Effectiveness.

The richest man in the next world will fall out Trump Due to the federal tax reform of the president and bills on the costs, headlines brought and introduced fresh drama into usually stagnant voices in Congress.

Tesla Bronigan’s lawyer noted the future jury on Monday: “It’s hard to hear Elon Musk’s name and have no opinion, positive or negative.”

“This case is not about Musk. But it is related to the company,” Branigan said, asking if he had a jury that they could not postpone.

Three possible jurors raised their hands to say that, yes, they had opinions about Musk, which would not allow them to approach the business impartially.

“It would be difficult. I understand that he is not Tesla. But he is very tied to the Tesla brand,” said one person, adding that he was not sure whether he could postpone his views.

The two other jurors who previously expressed the negative opinions of Moscow confirmed these views of Tesla’s lawyer.

Brangan asked one of the jurors that he wrote this man in response to a jury’s questionnaire about hearing things in the news related to Tesla.

Two other jurors who previously opposed Musk again opposed and shared the same opinions.

“This case is more about what happened, not whom it is,” the man replied.

“I’m quite independent,” he said. “I can be impartial, it is about the accident and what happened.”

Six women and three men were chosen for jury.

The lawsuit in the US District Court was filed against Tesla by the family of Nabel Benovidez, a pedestrian who died of a catastrophe and her boyfriend Dylon Angula, who suffered serious injuries. The vehicle driver, George McGe, is not a defendant in court, and he is reportedly settled with the plaintiffs earlier.

The plaintiffs claim that the Tesla autopilot function was defective and dangerous.

This is one of more than a dozen cases where Tesla sued death or harmful accidents when the driver was used by an autopilot of the company or complete self -government (under supervision).

FSD is a premium version of the partially automated Tesla control system. Autopilot is a standard option for all new Tesla vehicles.

Tesla describes Autopilot as “an advanced driver’s assistance system that boosts safety and convenience.”

“In addition, with full self-government (under supervision) you can drive a Tesla car almost anywhere, making changes to the lane, choose forks to follow your navigation route, move through other cars and objects and make the left and right under your active supervision,” says Tesla.

After the jurors were elected, Bret Schreiber, lawyer, said in the opening of the statement: “The evidence will be shown over the years before and after that the crime, Tesla ignored the warnings.”

“You will hear evidence of these motivations and why Tesla did what he did,” Schreiber said. “It was the Etos Silicon Valley of the Rapid Movement and Breaking Things? It will be determination.”

“What does not cause controversy is that the driver who crashed was careless, distracted, on the phone and threw it, and then grabbed him,” the lawyer said. “He plowed my client about 60 mph.”

“This is a matter of general responsibility. Tesla is not responsible for the failure of its autopilot. The evidence will be shown that each actor needs a scene, and Tesla creates the basis for preventing actions that bring us here,” Schreiber said.

The trial will be presented in the court that shows that Musk made public statements about “inhuman” sensors on Tesla vehicles, the lawyer said.

At one conference, Musk said the car was “safer than a man”, according to Schreiber.

Tesla, in a statement submitted by NBC News, said: “The data clearly shows that this catastrophe had nothing to do with the Tesla autopilot technology. Instead, like many unhappy accidents have been invented by cell phones, it was caused by a distracted driver.”

“He took responsibility for his actions for his merit because he sought his dumped cell phone, as well as pressing the accelerator, overcoming and overcoming the car system during the disaster. In 2019, when it happened, there was no technology for the avoidance of accidents that could interfere with this tragic accident.”

– Dan Manga Manga reported from New York, and Maria Piner reported Miami