Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Blake lively and Justin BaldoniA legal drama is undergoing the documentary treatment.
ITN Productions England is behind a new 90 -minute documentary program Said, he said: Blake lively vs Justin Baldoniis about to fly on Channel 5 in the UK on Monday, March 17.
“Manufactured by ITN Transatlantic Team This special tells timely and in detail about the Hollywood story that has captured the world -eag -based zitgeist,” International Head at ITN Productions Ian Russell said in a statement before the documentary’s premiere, per Diversity.
Commissioning Editor at 5, Denise Seneviratfollowing a statement itself.
“This story has enchanted the world, fulfilled by social media that is still gaining momentum,” he said. “It feels really relevant to us as a channel to be making this film in the context of ‘#Metoo.’ We are very happy to be working with ITN on this feature length version in the UK. “
According to a report by DiversityA shorter version of the documentary is about to fly in the United States later this month. The film was found by researching and will be streaming on Max and Discovery+ starting March 31.
The documentary will chronicle inserts and out of Lively and Baldoni’s legal battle around their 2024 film It ends with us. (Lively starred as Lily Bloom with Baldoni, who also directed the project, portraying Ryle Kincaid.)
Lively, 37, called Baldoni, 41, in a legal case in December 2024 claiming Sexual harassment on a set. He also claimed that Baldoni and his team had fostered a hostile work environment.
Baldoni has continued to deny his allegations, filing two legal cases himself. Will be suddenly The New York Times – who published a lively complaint in full – for $ 250 million. The suit has been placed on a pause after the newspaper since filed to be dismissed.
Prosecut Baldoni also lively, her husband, Ryan Reynoldsand publisher Leslie Sloane for $ 400 million. (Sloane has filed to be removed it from the suit. Lively and Reynolds have denied Baldoni accusations.)
The actors are expected to face in court next year, but a judge previously noted that Move up their trial date If the legal drama continues to play out in the press.
Blake Lively reported and reportedly reported Baldoni headings months before what expired with US costars filing legal cases. While Lively and Baldoni promoted the film in August 2024, rumors began to swirl from an alleged row between the pair. Fans noticed that lively promoted the film with some of her costars while Baldoni, who (…)
Earlier this month, a lively request for stronger a defensive order was partially issuedWith some applications from Baldoni side being rejected. The a defensive order It was adapted to include only attorneys’ eye provision, which means that some documents would only be seen by vibrant legal teams and Baldoni.
“Today, the Court rejected the objections of the road parties and entered the protections needed to ensure the free flow of the discovery material without any risk of witnessing or harm to the safety of any individual,” said a spokesman for a lively behalf Weekly US In a statement on March 13. “With this Order in action, Ms. Lively moves on in the discovery process to get even more of the evidence that will prove his allegations in court. ”
Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, made a statement of his own.
“We fully agree with the court’s decision to provide a narrow scope of protections to categories such as private mental health records and personal safety measures that have never been of interest to us. Instead of Ms.’s high demand Lively over the wide demand for documents for a period of 2 (and a half) of time the court removed correctly, ”he said, in part. “We continue to focus on the necessary communications that will contradict Ms.’s ungodly accusations Lively directly. We will oppose any efforts from Ms. Lively and her team to disrupt our clients’ ability to protect against her attacks by incorrectly categorizing important information as’ trade secrets, ‘especially considering that there were no problems in providing these communications ready for the New York Times. “
