Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Blake lively’s The legal team has accused Justin Baldoni’s a side of using “arid litigation” to prevent people from speaking out against alleged sexual harassment perpetrators.
Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieblawyers for vibrant, share a statement with Weekly US On Thursday, April 10, accusing Baldoni of trying to “tear down” laws that protect accusers.
“Mr Baldoni has gone from Monetizing a brand that is committed to believing and supporting women, to leading the accusation to tear the exact law that protects women who come forward for sexual assault, harassment and discrimination.” the statement to Us Reading. “The privilege of California’s sexual harassment, AB 933, was enacted to prevent the perpetrators of sexual harassment from abusing defamation lawsuits to prosecute their accusers to oblivion.”
The legal back and forth between a vibrant and Baldoni, who worked together It ends with us, Started in December 2024 when Lively accused baldoni of sexual harassment and maintaining a “cervical campaign” against it. The same month, Baldoni, 41, launched separate lawsuit against The New York Timeswho reported the allegations, and lively, 37, alleged defamation Among other allegations. (All Parties in question have denied all allegations against them mercilessly.)
In Thursday’s statement, Hudson and Gottlieb added that the legal tactics of the Baldoni team have sent a “chilling message.”
“The jasic message a crazy ground litigation Sending to victims remains quiet or destroyed, ”the statement reads.“ As shown in the Ms. brief solution Lively filed today, the road parties’ attempt to slap Ms Lively with a vengeful legal case for her decision to speak out against the sexual harassment she experienced on a set has not only failed to damage. Ms Lively will continue to show all victims not alone, who do not have to remain quiet, and that the law is on their side. “
Lively’s team filed a reply brief on Thursday, April 10 as they tried to reject the legal proceedings against the actress, claiming in documents seen by Weekly US “Wayfarer parties tied up in knots trying to identify a defamation claim against Ms Lively is not prohibited by the statute of restrictions or fully included in its legal complaints, which they cannot admit that they cannot form the basis of any executable claims.”
Late last month, lively lawyers filed the motion to dismiss In calling Baldoni’s claims “Venous and wandering” and mistreating the legal system. The paperwork argued that Section 47.1 of California Civil Code prohibits vengeful lawsuits associated with public disclosures of sexual harassment.
Baldoni attorney, Bryan Freedman, He responded to the proposal on Thursday, April 3, through the defense of Baldoni’s Complaint, who is alleged to provide details of “efforts calculated in lively first to extort and treat” Baldoni and his production team Wayfarer Studios “into complete control over the film It ends with us and then to defam them and their scapegoat when he made her back -up plan. “
Update: 1/7/24, 12 pm ET – Bryan Freedman, Justin Baldoni’s lawyer, announced the following statement in response to Lively’s team: “It is ironic that Blake Lively accuses Justin Baldoni of arming the media when her own team arranges the new times by sending the new York documents
“Ms Lively and her cycle of Hollywood elites cannot prevent my clients from exercising their constitutional right to petition the court to clear their names from his false and harmful allegations,” read Freedman’s statement on April 3. “What Ms. Lively is trying Punishing their clients, as they are being deemed to get their clients.
The response continued: “This right defends not only Mr Baldoni and the road parties in this particular case, but all future Americans with false accusations are raised against them and seek relief from our justice system. This must end here, and we will continue to fight this obvious attempt to prevent access to the vegetable system.
